

Perhaps the looming prospect of having to do it every 47 days was enough.


Perhaps the looming prospect of having to do it every 47 days was enough.


Wow, I guess that makes sense. But if they were going to move to a significant count of Linux machines I would assume that an enterprise edition (like red hat) would probably be covered by insurance. Since they then have someone to blame.


We have had success with this on port 443 and it appears to do a good job on networks that only allow browsing. Usual problems with TCP based VPN still apply.


When accessing yt make sure you always update to nightly, stable take too long to get the updates.
–update-to nightly


I saw this on a few sysadmin posts, from what I saw and what people described I have a theory that it was an unexpected interaction.
Those with the deletion had a expiration date for the donation licenses past the July '26 deadline. That shouldn’t have happened as far as I can tell from the notification email. We had some of these, but I think the difference was the presence of other licenses.
Those with only the 10 donations and none of the other free licenses, would have become unlicensed when they were removed. There is a cool off for deletions, but if the licence had the wrong expiration, then the deadline date might have been set from the original expiration. Due to the incorrect extension that date might then have been in the past. Leading to the wrong deletions.
I have no way to confirm any of that and ms are not going to admit it. I don’t think it was malicious, but is still a appalling show from Microsoft.
It’s open, just some businesses don’t bother to support it.


It converts it from being something someone said, into something you can point at and say “we have evidence of it happening.”


I still have assistant, but will be sad when they take it away. Setting timers is literally the only thing I use it for.
They were still trying to piece together the camera.


It was great when I first got it, but I ended but getting fatigued with it. New releases wanted time investment, but the rising costs meant I felt I should play more stuff. In the end everything I wanted to play required time and I felt that I was no longer getting value out of it. It would have cost less to not have it and just buy the game for some titles.


Am I alone in not wanting to put my username into that field? If they don’t have it will they then just decide that it’s now a good time to scrape it? Or are they going to record that it was searched?


I use qobuz for stuff that is not on bandcamp, big enough to be part of standard distribution, but also let’s you buy and download lossless.


Pretty sure windows has supported installing drivers that include program installs since windows 7. Razor mice also do the same thing where it auto installs the control software.


Free ones are less common now (no-ip went paid.) Afraiddns is still free but requires regular account logins.


I don’t expect the office apps to continue supporting ltsc tbh, so hopefully it lasts long enough for you.
Windows does aggressive caching now but will clear that if the memory is needed so I often find the in use value to not be as useful of an indicator now.
I will say if that was a 4gb machine I don’t expect it will run 11 that well, we now will only ok 16gb computers. Not just for windows, but chrome et al all have ridiculous memory usage now.


If anyone goes with finamp, sign up for the test version as it’s UI is significantly better than stable.
Will I be able to see that before clicking on the video? I just got an update and the video information is now squished to a single line. So if the channel name is long, I can’t see the age of the video. If they add it to the end, everyone will just have long names to hide it.


You need the web site to use a certificate from the same root authority as your client certificate. Otherwise browsers won’t present the certificate to the server. That means either warnings on connect or adding the root cert.
I do think if you are doing it with them in person it is doable to add it.


I recently did exactly this. Only works with the web UI, no apps support it, but working well and those without the cert just get a 400 error. Not sure if non technical tbh, since you will get warnings when adding your root certificates to any device, and that might scare some who don’t understand what it does.
Also set it up through wireguard, so can punch out of double NAT.
I believe someone is doing a remake with a newer version.