That’s a given, but I think they are suggesting they added one for the us government.

Had a freezer fixed on warranty recently. What needed replacing? An electric heater. Yes the freezer has a heater in it!

(It’s for the anti frost feature.)

echo hello >  /dev/tcp/2b00:13c0:47:1422::5/7236

Sounds like the whole thing was just a way for them to extract training costs from roofers.

If I didn’t exist I would also fail at the job I had been given.

I checked and this does a similar thing. You can use WG to punch out a connection, and I have before. The linked program uses quic in a similar way to WG but doesn’t do any of the routing, just registers the connection to a hostname for application level forwarding.

It looks more that it provides an easy setup for an alternative.

Both methods can work on cg-nat as well since you are punching out.

I believe someone is doing a remake with a newer version.

Perhaps the looming prospect of having to do it every 47 days was enough.

Wow, I guess that makes sense. But if they were going to move to a significant count of Linux machines I would assume that an enterprise edition (like red hat) would probably be covered by insurance. Since they then have someone to blame.

We have had success with this on port 443 and it appears to do a good job on networks that only allow browsing. Usual problems with TCP based VPN still apply.

When accessing yt make sure you always update to nightly, stable take too long to get the updates.

–update-to nightly

I saw this on a few sysadmin posts, from what I saw and what people described I have a theory that it was an unexpected interaction.

Those with the deletion had a expiration date for the donation licenses past the July '26 deadline. That shouldn’t have happened as far as I can tell from the notification email. We had some of these, but I think the difference was the presence of other licenses.

Those with only the 10 donations and none of the other free licenses, would have become unlicensed when they were removed. There is a cool off for deletions, but if the licence had the wrong expiration, then the deadline date might have been set from the original expiration. Due to the incorrect extension that date might then have been in the past. Leading to the wrong deletions.

I have no way to confirm any of that and ms are not going to admit it. I don’t think it was malicious, but is still a appalling show from Microsoft.

It’s open, just some businesses don’t bother to support it.

It converts it from being something someone said, into something you can point at and say “we have evidence of it happening.”

I still have assistant, but will be sad when they take it away. Setting timers is literally the only thing I use it for.

They were still trying to piece together the camera.

It was great when I first got it, but I ended but getting fatigued with it. New releases wanted time investment, but the rising costs meant I felt I should play more stuff. In the end everything I wanted to play required time and I felt that I was no longer getting value out of it. It would have cost less to not have it and just buy the game for some titles.

Am I alone in not wanting to put my username into that field? If they don’t have it will they then just decide that it’s now a good time to scrape it? Or are they going to record that it was searched?

I use qobuz for stuff that is not on bandcamp, big enough to be part of standard distribution, but also let’s you buy and download lossless.

Pretty sure windows has supported installing drivers that include program installs since windows 7. Razor mice also do the same thing where it auto installs the control software.