

Besides with software industry being pretty big, I think that the crisis may take another 50 years before having an effect they describe, not many of laid off now people will be able to wait for it
Rust dev, I enjoy reading and playing games, I also usually like to spend time with friends.
You can reach me on mastodon @sukhmel@mastodon.online or telegram @sukhmel@tg


Besides with software industry being pretty big, I think that the crisis may take another 50 years before having an effect they describe, not many of laid off now people will be able to wait for it


I feel like a lot of said leaders would be perfectly fine with a positive answer


Probably not, but I also never seen MM used for millions, usually just M as opposed to k used for thousands


Be the change you want to see
I felt like this was something meta, but thanks for putting it clearly. It is a reasonable observation, but I feel like it’s a bit tangential to tool being a tool and is more about the context luggage that a tool carries
You got me interested, so I read it. It’s good that the article is so short, it’s bad that there’s no actual argument there


I hope that fair and extensive education and a transparent discussion of issues in the society would help. I’m yet to see a society that tries this, so maybe it’s also not going to work


Yeah, it worked really well historically, and with absolutely no negative side effects whatsoever


It’s a long line of ‘you should just protest/vote harder’ countries, unfortunately


Ok, I thought you were being sarcastic at first


I prefer to sell customers


I wouldn’t be so sure, but time will tell, eventually


Yeah, everyone is outraged at being a product when using free services, but then also outraged at paid ones.
I’m a bit suspicious of how they want to implement scoring, I feel like it’s either going to be gamed by users or rigged by owners, but otherwise it looks fine as an idea and as a replacement for xitter


In general, yes
In this case it’s more like if everyone is selling eggs $1/egg, but the tag shows the price based on the last transaction, so when someone buys an egg for $10 you suddenly increase everyone’s worth ten times. If they start selling the price may collaps faster than they can sell


To me it sounds like they took a lot of shortcuts and everyone from the team, barring the last engineer standing, were driven away by the looming Mount Debt


Surfshark with Kazakhstan out node, but it works with VPN now, so maybe it was something else 🤔


Doesn’t open with VPN, not very nice


Maybe it was some kind of sarcastic jab, but I don’t really understand the point either


Or the pigeon can be the drone itself, what a wonderful world it is
I’m guessing, they mean the user of a future that already exists as it is, what you mean is you can implement a future that would provide a way for the code inside to know of being cancelled. But most of the time you don’t do that, and a function that was polled once and then dropped will never know about that