![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
They work in terminal. To me a more interesting question would be, why VSCode over PyCharm for Python for example.
They work in terminal. To me a more interesting question would be, why VSCode over PyCharm for Python for example.
That’s how it supposed to be done.
I’m jealous.
I love when FCC at least appears to do something, not like under Shit Pai.
Frankly though they should revise Title II classification for the Internet and remove exception from the requirement to share last mile to competitors. This is the main reason there’s almost no competition. It doesn’t make sense for every single ISP to run lines to every home. Those lines should be leaseable.
They could always remove those complex fees and make the bill simpler…
It is notoriously hard to replicate things in labs, especially with material science.
This was attempt to do it within 2 days of the paper being published.
To add to that, the original researchers apparently had 10% successes rate in their lab, they wanted to perfect it before publishing their paper.
Bad luck was that it leaked, so to make sure somebody else doesn’t get credit for their work they published what they had within hours.
It likely will take months before this will be verified.
And that’s exactly how it will be used
Also make sure to let your representatives know how you feel.
Please write to politicians that you support it, because they are hoping to make them back off.
You know admins can easily remove anything drawn there. They are trying to bring traffic back, because of the upcoming IPO.
But does actually work like an IDE? I for example love PyCharm understanding type annotation. Not only it highlights errors, but also improves autocompletion and makes big refactoring less scary.
The integration with data grip (unfortunately that’s available in paid version) allows for similar behavior with SQL contained in strings. Which IMO fixes the impedance mismatch that created the need for query builders and ORM frameworks.