Professional software engineer, musician, gamer, stoic, democratic socialist
The fastest marathon time for men is 2 hours 1 minute and for women it is 2 hours 14 minutes.
It’s an unacceptable leap in logic to infer (from that statement) anything about populations of men and women. You’ve picked only a single sample from each population and chosen that highly biased representative.
So… It’s expensive and mediocre at everything?
Sorry if that sounds harsh but I honestly can’t think of a reason I’d want one of these.
Stop using Brave, people.
Rate-limiting could also be applied at the federation level, but I’m less sure of what the implementation would look like. Requiring filters on a per-account basis might be resource intensive.
Why resort to an expensive decentralized mechanism when we already have a client-server model? We can just implement rate-limiting on the server.
Are sockets not files?
Objects may have a single trailing comma.
I just came.
Large ISPs still don’t support it. It’s a fucking travesty.
I think there’s a pretty big overlap of gamers and programmers who use Windows or WSL because they don’t want to have to dual boot.
It’s definitely faster. I have seen measurements from many people showing that Windows is slower compiling Bevy on the same hardware.
Yea I agree. Good UX is a lot of work, and I think FOSS projects rarely prioritize it. Even good documentation is hard to come by. When you write software for your own use case, it’s easy to cut UX corners, because you don’t need your hand held.
And good UX for a programmer might be completely different from good UX for someone that only knows how to use GUIs. E.g. NixOS has amazing UX for programmers, but the code-illiterate would be completely lost.
I believe that the solution is “progressive disclosure”, and it requires a lot of effort. You basically need every interface to have both the “handholding GUI” and the underlying “poweruser config,” and there needs to be a seamless transition between the two.
I actually think we could have an amazing Linux distro for both “normies” and powerusers if this type of UX were the primary focus of developers.
The only correct answer is to be consistent with the code base you’re working in or the language’s conventions. If neither of these conventions exist, then someone has already failed you.
It seems irrelevant whether this person is using encrypted channels if they failed to maintain anonymity. If they distributed material and leaked any identifying info (e.g. IP address), then it would be trivial for investigators or CIs to track them down.
Writing poetry => meth + crack???
You can’t configure an immutable distro by a sequence of mutations.
Isn’t that literally how ostree works?
You should say “unstable channel”. It’s literally just a rolling release that pulls from the nixpkgs master branch. So it’s only as stable as it needs to be to pass the Hydra CI tests.
And if you get to a working version, you can pin that as a Nix flake to avoid anything breaking until the next time you nix flake update.
Seems like a perfectly cromulent English sentence to me.
It’s so ironic how many downvotes this is getting in the context of this thread.
Fair, but it’s also limited to the very top of the bell curve at any point in time.