Anything from !unix_surrealism@lemmy.sdf.org

Which I’m sure some of them are, but not in the capacity that anyone wants them to be.

I laughed, then I cried :_(

I do believe my experience in this regard is not representative of everyone, I probably failed to untick some checkbox (regarding communications) and the “too many ad emails” are a handful (in 3 months), which to me is a handful too much (having to untick a box should not be necessary)

I get your point, though Tailscale specifically crosses a line for me in this sense:

• Using code created/maintained by businesses: ok
• Relying in infrastructure maintained by businesses: not ok

I am not that big of an enthusiast, but the way I see it, if a company goes rogue and you’re using their open source code, it’s just a matter of forking it (I’m thinking about Emby/Jellyfin as an example) If you rely on their infrastructure (such as Tailscale servers) then you are at the mercy of the companies

To that end: I’d say that OP is prettt on point by suggesting Headscale, you’re still “using Tailscale” in a sense, but without chaining yourself to the business

Yup, I don’t know if that is OP’s intention, but I would agree myself with the complaint that “Tailscale is a business”

The way I see it, if it’s a business it must generate revenue (either now or down the road), and that is enough to have me worried. I do have a Tailscale registration, and the way they approach email communication is already a yellow flag to me (too many ad emails)

And an ISO q1 while we’re at it I also have one of those and I love it dearly