theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
15·
6 months agoRemoved by mod
You’ve heard of no true Scotsman, well that’s compared to me, the only true Scotsman. Everything I am is all things that are forever and not, therefore the fallacy isn’t.
- 0 Posts
- 24 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
Cake day: December 7th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
Removed by mod
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
Removed by mod
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
Removed by mod
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
Removed by mod
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
93·6 months agoAnd save the forests, restore the salmon population, and allow proper watershed restoration.
Hydro is the worst renewable; nuclear is infinitely better.
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
17·6 months agoRemoved by mod
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
Oh no, you’ve never read theory or anything even marginally related to economics from anything but a corporatist perspective.
I’m so sorry.
Anyway this discussion is above you. China is a socialist state. They are a dictatorship of the proletariat, not of capital. Their economy is centrally planned. Their economy is 60% publicly owned. The part of the economy that is a private market has nothing to do with anything essential to life. No part of Marx nor Lenin’s work precludes a market economy. Not one single part.
Read your theory.
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
NATO has nothing to do with brics. Given you have no idea how Chinas economy works I guess I shouldn’t have expected you to know the difference between economic and military pacts.
Over half the world’s GDP and population are a part of brics btw.
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
The nordics have less than 40% of their economy in the private sector? Got literally any sources for that little one?
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
Removed by mod
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
Removed by mod
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
What basic macroeconomics? The fact China’s economy is insulated from capital and isn’t reliant on imports anymore?
China isn’t a capitalist nation in anyway. They have a private market, which cannot effect the rest of the economy.
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
Correct, 5% of GDP, specifically from the private sector, would not effect China. It’d make some investors mad, but no one would lose their home, no one would starve, hell they wouldn’t even be out of work unless they refused public sector jobs - of which there are nearly twice as many as private sector jobs.
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
The country with a 17 trillion usd GDP? Yeah the half trillion in exports isn’t that important.
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
Removed by mod
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
Actually they don’t. Their own middle class is outspending the US, and brics ensures the US isnt ever the primary consumer market ever again.
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
Not really, they’re the one country besides Israel that the US will never invade or go to war with, since it would permanently end the US economy.
- theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.worksto
No, the tense is different. Reread and try again.
Maybe ask yourself why I included year between purchase statistics.
Removed by mod