This is literally the first time you have said you use maps, so yes, you are a liar? Literally?
It’s not a discussion because you’re not bringing anything to the discussion lmao
This is literally the first time you have said you use maps, so yes, you are a liar? Literally?
It’s not a discussion because you’re not bringing anything to the discussion lmao
Do you? ArcGIS and navigating in the field are not the same thing. I assume you don’t, or else you wouldn’t have brought up a tangentially related skill?
You’re just saying my mind is made up because you don’t have anything to contribute to the discussion lol
Do you go outside and use the maps? And navigate in the field with a compass? I am sorry but yes, obviously using a computer program is going to be somewhat similar to playing a video game.
Making maps and using maps are not the same skills.
It’s marginal utility is not worth the energy expenditures.
as someone who grew up playing DnD and video games, and also does navigation in the outdoors for work …
these are two entirely different skill sets be fucking for real lmao
I didn’t miscomprehend, you just disagree with my reasonable assertion that AI is pointless and sucks. Hope this helps!
They’re taking about emissions, not energy use. You have a reading comprehension issue. The emissions are from the energy production. It’s logical to say that a, largely pointless, technology using high amounts of electricity cause emissions through the generation of electricity to power the pointless AI tech.
No reason for this to have been removed