Hi!
My previous/alt account is yetAnotherUser@feddit.de which will be abandoned soon.
In 2012, the Landgericht Hamburg (Regional Court) partially upheld Sony’s claims.
That’s Germany’s most blatantly biased court for copyright infringement by the way. Any regional court can be chosen when suing for copyright infringement but it’s always Hamburg that handles these cases. Be careful when publishing pictures of your home on the internet - your wallpaper may be copyrighted and you may have to pay a few thousand euros.
Couldn’t there be an implementation thay leaves everyone satisfied?
Sort of like implementating a new optional tab for discovery and allowing users to choose whether their posts appear on it. The implementation should of course be fully honest without dark patterns, though due to the lack of profit incentive it shouldn’t be difficult to achieve a satisfying implementation.
*boops your brain*
Young people see news influencers on social media which are even less trustworthy than traditional news outlets.
It’s the “I did my own research” of news.
Label the remappable button STREAMING SERVICE or something, I don’t know.
They should call it GNULinux instead
Huh, that wasn’t there yesterday when this was posted, I’ve checked everything I have access to
Either way, it’s everywhere now
It’s a little more specific, I think the patent is about:
But that’s still something multiple games have done in some way I think.
Finally it will be easier to do the whole posting something controversial and then putting the phone in your butt
Telegram has public groups which function nearly identical to social media. Signal does not.
If Amazon AWS began hosting nazi websites and refused to take them down, should the CEO be arrested? I’d say yes.
At least the addons part has been mostly resolved - although not all addons are supported, Firefox mobile now has significantly more official addons than before:
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2024/05/02/1000-firefox-for-android-extensions-now-available/
For mobile, I’d recommend Mull instead of Iceraven
Pros:
Cons:
Here’s a probably somewhat biased but from quickly skimming over it not inaccurate browser comparison by the developer(s) of Mull:
https://divestos.org/pages/browsers
Also based GrapheneOS user
Depending on who compromised you, paying the ransom is the smart move.
As long as the hacker group has a somewhat established name and reputation, they have more to lose from keeping a copy afterwards than to gain. Trust is like half of the business model for these groups - throwing it all away for a one-time gain isn’t the smartest move.
And while you should obviously keep a backup, in the end it might be cheaper to just pay up, especially because of potential future lawsuits should customer data be leaked.
Also, you should absolutely make sure the hackers actually have stolen data instead of merely encrypting it all with a secret key. There’s no point in paying in that case.
You don’t necessarily need speech for consent since non-verbal/mute people exist.
But that would be worse?
The solution to women being treated unfairly is not to start treating men unfairly too. It’s to treat women fairly.