A manager. This tool is for what managers think software development is: managing the production of code. From that perspective this hype makes a lot of sense, just turn all your current developers into managers with AI and you now have grown the team by 10x. You can go back in time and find many jokes about how adding more developers doesn’t speed up delivery but slows it down. I don’t see how AI would suddenly make that less true, especially since the AI is not accountable for its results, you are.

And maybe the half bottle of wine I drank. But I definitely didn’t do it on purpose.

… Yes I said I wouldn’t mind if something terrible happened to her, but that isn’t a motive.

Well that and the Father saying he wouldn’t feel bad if something terrible happened to her because he has two better behaved daughters.

MoRe OpTiOnS iS bAd FoR cOmPeTiTiOn

But if something’s dirty after you touch it The problem is your hands, dipshit Cut it off

Meh, you both deserve each other honestly. Too concerned with being right that we all lost focus of what is good.

But you don’t understand that they’re talking about systems while you’re talking about personal choice.

Big picture is AI not being able to operate under unusual conditions means that the “10 times better” (if it were only true) has a big fucking caveat where we can’t say the stat will hold true if we replace all drivers.

I think more want to be “influencers” because they don’t have any relatives that can give them a small multi-million dollar loan.

For this to be practical you need to audit and control the code the runs in the data center. I think that was a hangup with some Chinese based services that offered to host in the EU.

This guy has kids right? I would be so embarrassed

Sure, but why is he the alternative we should bring up?

This was a distraction from Venezuela, which was a distraction from Epstein, which was a distraction from the fact we elected this guy twice.

IDK, a lot of that data center AI hardware is built to self-destruct after a few years. It’s going to take time for the factories to retool before we see prices drop back down.

The closeted ones may still vote for a woman just to say they aren’t part of the problem, like they did with Obama. But the candidate has to sell change, they aren’t going to vote for the same policies but advanced by someone who doesn’t look like them.

Which is why it is so strange to see the a female candidate pander to those voters. Plenty of stupidity to go around.

That’s an incredibly reactionary take on technology. Look at how open source is qualitatively different from their proprietary counterparts for a clear example of how the base doesn’t just dictate how a tool is used, but how tools are made and how the constraints built into the tool effect how they are used.

I’ve read enough Marx to know the base dictates the shape of the superstructure which includes technology like LLMs.

As if this technology isn’t a product and in service of capitalist relations. Go read Chomsky to see how CNC machines were designed in a way to strengthen capitalist control. gAI is being developed with the same business logic: eliminate jobs at the cost of quality and robustness.

And he encouraged others to do so. It is almost like this is a bigger issue for women or girls for some reason. I’m probably sexist for noticing.