Jenoki@lemmy.ml to Piracy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoThis is the waylemmy.mlimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1118arrow-down139
arrow-up179arrow-down1imageThis is the waylemmy.mlJenoki@lemmy.ml to Piracy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-squareZeroEcks@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down1·1 year agoSometimes you need to seed back more than 200% because the other two people might not be able to seed it back. I would generally not set a limit
minus-squareRustmilian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down5·edit-21 year agoTrue, but as a minimum you should be doing 200%. Also in a ideal scenario that 200% would be spread out to a lot more people then just 2.
minus-squarelittleblue✨@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down5·1 year agoOP is showing 200% as their maximum. That’s the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼
minus-squareRustmilian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·1 year agoNo shit Sherlock 🫴
minus-squarelittleblue✨@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down5·1 year agoI’m not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗
minus-squareRustmilian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down6·edit-21 year agoI have no time for children.
Sometimes you need to seed back more than 200% because the other two people might not be able to seed it back. I would generally not set a limit
True, but as a minimum you should be doing 200%.
Also in a ideal scenario that 200% would be spread out to a lot more people then just 2.
OP is showing 200% as their maximum. That’s the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼
No shit Sherlock 🫴
I’m not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗
I have no time for children.
yo momma🤌🏿