Madbrad200@sh.itjust.workscake to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-22 years agoIt would appear lemmy.world has blocked this communitysh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up120arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up119arrow-down1external-linkIt would appear lemmy.world has blocked this communitysh.itjust.worksMadbrad200@sh.itjust.workscake to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-22 years agomessage-square82fedilinkfile-text
!piracy@lemmy.ml has also been blocked from lemmy.world. edit: Lemmy.world has released an official response.
minus-squareWarrior of Ukraine@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoLemmy.world overtook beehaw and .ml because they promised to not go bonkers with power tripping defederation. Now they’re beehaw but with far more power over lemmy. Fuck that instance.
minus-squareDamage@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoSuggestion: account on small instance, communities on large ones
minus-squareQuazarOmega@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoWhy communities on large ones, doesn’t that achieve centralization of the content?
minus-squareDamage@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoWell, not if the communities are distributed across several large instances, no? Small istances don’t have the resources to host large communities
Lemmy.world overtook beehaw and .ml because they promised to not go bonkers with power tripping defederation. Now they’re beehaw but with far more power over lemmy. Fuck that instance.
Suggestion: account on small instance, communities on large ones
Why communities on large ones, doesn’t that achieve centralization of the content?
Well, not if the communities are distributed across several large instances, no?
Small istances don’t have the resources to host large communities