• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Well perhaps there shouldn’t be 45 different streaming services then? If it was just one streaming service that I could pay you for and then everything I wanted was on that site then there wouldn’t be a problem would there?

    Also that would solve the problem of content being removed from streaming services because they got a better deal on some other service that I’m not subscribed to.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Music has this right. Don’t like spotify? Try Tidal, Qobuz, etc. They all have the same music, but slightly different models to attract different users (Spotify has free and paid tiers, Tidal does high quality, Qobuz does streaming plans as well as individual song purchases).

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Exactly. I’d be fine with picking my favorite streaming service and adding on a bundle for some additional content. As in, I could get Netflix for $10/month, and add Disney+ content for another $5 or whatever.

        That way I can pick the service I want without losing the content I want, and the content creators still get paid for their content while keeping prices for most people low.

        That’s kind of how Steam works, I can buy any game I want and both Steam and the dev get paid. Or I can buy the game through the dev directly and the dev gets a bigger cut. I’ll choose Steam if the experience there is better, or I’ll choose the dev if they provide a good experience. That should be how streaming works…

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          God, it’s cable TV packages all over again. Streaming was supposed to destroy this problem, not become it!

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The problem with cable TV was that I still can’t watch what I want, when I want. With streaming, I can. But the more services there are with exclusives, the more apps I need to get the content I want.

            If I can pick the content I want at any streaming service, then the choice becomes about which streaming service I want, not what content I want. I hate juggling apps, and I’d rather pay a bit extra on one app to get more content than continually switch apps.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      If we had to subscribe to Spotify and Amazon and Tidal and all the others to have all the artists we wanted to listen to, then I’d pirate those too.

      Convenience is what I’m after, free is just a bonus.

    • NutWrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      A lot of these streaming services are ultimately owned by the same company. Ever had a favorite show, where only seasons 1,3 and 5 are available on one “service” and only seasons 2 and 4 are available on the other? This lets the owner of the series double-dip customers on subscription fees.