• theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    No, the community needs to cyber bully them off the platform. They need to feel rejection for their words, not censorship. Censorship lets them frame themselves as the victim as they seek out a smaller echo chamber on the fringes. They need to learn their words will turn the community against them

    We still have to live with them. We can’t ignore them or silence them - we have to correct them

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      And what would happen when the community itself is built on hatred and welcomes hate wholeheartedly?

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        What do you mean? It works the same way, the opinion of the community will pull you closer to the group consensus. Too much exposure will have horrible things you don’t really believe spilling out of your mouth

        Don’t go there, don’t spread word about it, don’t feed it in any way. It’s like flood water - pull others out of it if you can, but minimize your exposure

        As to shutting them down if you have the ability? Shutting down a cesspool is good - it fragments the echo chamber, and some members won’t make the migration. The only question is if I trust the one making that decision to remain impartial

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Yeah, trusting someone to make right decisions is hard because this trust usually ends up being betrayed sooner or later.

          Regarding the first part, I meant that we as a community can’t put enough pressure on a bully to make em leave, if that bully is part of the community that supports em.