• CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    16 hours ago

    What issues do people even have with firefox? Its a browser, it seems fast enough. Isn’t that all most people need from a browser

    • kat@orbi.camp
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Security and sandboxing are important, weak points on the android implementation.

      • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        would Vivaldi on android be better? I really like having extensions on my browser and that’s the only other android one I know of that has them.

        Edit: I was wrong apparently Vivaldi does not support extensions on mobile which is a bummer.

    • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Mainly that Google intentionally makes its sites (like YouTube or Google Docs) slower and less useable when they detect you’re using Firefox, and/or ad blockers (which you need Firefox to use, so same difference).

      It’s mostly fixable with add-ons and userscripts (and eventually, one hopes, with an antitrust lawsuit), but it’s still a hassle.

      • Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Unfortunately, with the FTC rolling back net neutrality protections, I don’t see an antitrust lawsuit happening, or succeeding, anytime soon

      • gi1242@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        how do I find out more about this and what scripts do I need to make the sites faster again on Firefox

        • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 hours ago

          https://www.tomshardware.com/news/youtube-responds-to-delayed-loading-in-rival-browser-complaints, for instance.

          Or https://www.zdnet.com/article/former-mozilla-exec-google-has-sabotaged-firefox-for-years/, for an older one.

          As for how to fix it, Mozilla tend to do a pretty good job of eventually working around Google’s bullshit, so keeping the browser updated is a good first step.

          Since Google tends to roll this stuff out regionally and doing A/B testing, though, the best way is to identify what specific handicap they’re hassling you with (which specific features don’t work or don’t work right, when they work properly on chrome), and look for an updated add on or userscript to fix that particular issue.

          Or you can just look for a generic YouTube or Google Docs “enhancer” add on and hope it fixes the issue without making the whole user experience too different from what you’re used to.

          • gi1242@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            thanks. I keep Firefox updated. the fact that changing the user agent gets the delay is pretty damning evidence

            • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              At one particular point it was, if I recall correctly, though Chrome also (mis)implements some standards its own way, so Google might also use that as a form of attack against anyone who implements them properly, much like Microsoft did in the bad old IE6 days…

              It’s all a silly arms race, though, with Google coming up with new ways to enshittify the web for anyone not using Chrome or using ad blockers and Mozilla and ad blocker (and alternative YouTube frontend) developers trying to figure out what they broke this time and how to fix it, so what worked yesterday might not work today and work again tomorrow.

              It’s all a profoundly stupid waste of everyone’s time and resources (all for a few more ad views) which will hopefully end up with Google losing their monopoly position on the web like the Internet Explorer bullshit did for Microsoft, but will keep being a major hassle for everyone until it does.

    • Prox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      No horizontal tab grouping. Tab groups on Chrome are perfect, and the Firefox tab extensions all suck in comparison.

      That said, I’m still using Firefox today because the internet is unusable without a good ad blocker.

      • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I still use the full screen tab groups feature that they removed from the core. I don’t like scrolling tabs, so I can just hit a button and click on the exact tab I want. I do probably have too many tabs open tbh.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I very much dislike Mozilla’s direction over the last decade. They’re introducing user-hostile features that subtly break normal browsing experience, even when disabled[0]. Not like Google is better, but I’m also trying to get away from Mozilla.

      [0] On Firefox Mobile, there’s a “feature” which makes the address bar auto-complete domains of companies paying Mozilla. I noticed this with Netflix - I never visit, but when I start writing a URL with n, roughly every 10th time Netflix was suggested. You can disable this feature, but this doesn’t actually disable it. The address bar no longer auto-completes with Netflix, instead it just doesn’t autocomplete! So 9/10 times I can write n and press Enter, but 1/10 times I press n and search for the letter n.

      Mozilla doesn’t care whether they break features, as long as they can make more money. I strongly dislike this approach by the supposedly “good” browser manufacturer.

      • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Do you have a good non chromium based alternative? To be clear I genuinely am asking those things make switching probably worth it considering how little of a hassle it is.

          • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            isn’t chromium under the Linux foundation now? Might look at the options on that side.

            • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              No, it’s still 100% owned and 100% controlled by Google.

              The Linux Foundation is just making it easier for people outside of Google to submit work to it.

              Cynically, you could say that Google is just trying to get free contributions while retaining all the control. Optimistically you could say this is the first step in Google giving up control of Chromium in the far future, although currently they’ve given zero verbal or written indicators that they plan to do that.

          • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            This comment made me look into if KDE has one and apparently they do it even has built in ad blocking.

            Off to compile for 3 hours. /j

      • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Download fennec it’s the fork of ff mobile with less of the cruft.

        I don’t know if it has fixed that specific problem, but I can’t recall seeing it

    • Zier@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Too many people complain about the UI and claim it’s “outdated, ugly, unusable”. I find that funny because you can make FF look almost like anything you want, and I personally hate chrome’s UI.

      • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I’m one of those complaining about the UI. Used the TabMixPlus extension to adjust the UI to my liking. FF killed it. So, I started customizing the UI CSS. Every few versions, Mozilla changed the browser enough to invalidate my changes. After a while, I got tired of thiz and switched to Vivaldi, which is Chromium based.

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Well, you USED to be able to, anyways, but they’ve slowly moved to a less customisable ui. Now you have to use extensions from outside websites to even do simple stuff like have a multi-row tab bar.

        Not to mention Firefox seems to break them every year or so.

    • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Some js is a bit slower. I typically use chrome for self hosted apps, jupyter etc.

      I think wasm performance is actually better in Firefox though.

    • krimson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I have no idea either. Sure, chrome is a little faster but its a minor difference in my opinion. Been using it for a long time and have no idea why it’s so unpopular.

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Also, keep in mind, google has been caught slowing Firefox down in YouTube before. So if you notice any slowness in their services, it’s fair to suspect it might not be Firefox’s fault.

      • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Was Is a little faster.

        No way it stays that way after blocking ad-blocking. Some websites genuinely take over 30s without ad block.

    • Sheldan@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I advocate Firefox, but I must admit I personally am affected by regular crashes on Firefox desktop. Mostly when I enter a page I haven’t visited before (randomly though).

      I don’t know if others are affected by this, and I still recommend Firefox regardless, but every crash leaves a sour taste in my mouth. As it is not widespread, it might just be my setup, but still.

      • Zier@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        14 hours ago

        That’s not normal. You should go to the support pages and see if there is a fix. And it could be an addon causing the issue, not FF itself. I had that issue many years back.

      • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Thats really weird. I have never personally had the issue but it is more and fair enough to have issues with FF after that. I would recommend brave then, still chromium based but is actively doing things to make sure their adblock still works.

        • Sheldan@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          I dont have issues with FF in general which would cause me to stop using it, while it is frustrating, not using something chromium based still outweighs that heavily. Its kinda of a matter of principle to me. E: clarification

    • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      In Australia it won’t save card details. And it can’t natively create app shortcuts for things like Gmail, keep, whatsapp etc.

      I put up with it but it’s a pain compared to chrome and edge.

      • palordrolap@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        You could probably convince a third-party password storage program to store and auto-type details like that. Preferably one that doesn’t need internet access to work.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          KeePass allows offline password management, though I am not sure if it supports card/ID autofill.

          Bitwarden is mainly online only, but does support card/ID autofill and allows users to self-host their data if desired.

          Not overly familiar with other password managers, but it would not surprise me if one of them out there has the best of both worlds.

          • palordrolap@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Just double-checked with the help manual of the one I use (PasswordSafe) and it looks like it can do it. Never actually tried it though, which is one of the reasons I didn’t mention it previously.

            At the risk of sounding like an ad (I’m not affiliated, just a someone who found it in their Linux distro’s package manager), there are versions of it for pretty much any device. I definitely can’t vouch for the feature set(s) of the other versions, though.