• JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s lots of ways to make existing hardware more efficient at the cost of performance. Under-volting the CPU and RAM (or just putting them in “efficiency” mode) can probably save more electricity than you lose in generational improvements. Considering how much more powerful PCs are compared to SBCs, you’d probably still have better performance than an SBC. Also, a more powerful CPU that takes double the power but as a result can idle for more than 50% of the time would be more efficient than a less powerful CPU never idling.

    There’s a lot of other variables (like idle power draw, efficiency at various power levels, idle latency, etc), but in general I think your statement would be inaccurate at least 60% of the time.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Oh I am not saying specifically get a raspberry pi, personally looking at a bee-link N150 mini PC. It isn’t even that much more expensive than the 16GB raspberry pi and as its x86 I can just run normal debian installs in proxmox.

      • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        The post is talking about RPis and other SBCs. Mini PCs are in a whole different category.

          • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Yes it’s relevant. I have been one of the people making it. However they didn’t specificy what they were actually comparing in their first comment. So it ends up they are saying something false. Your average laptop could easily beat a raspberry pi in performance per watt.