• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This came out a while ago. The developer used a license that said, “Steal this software, I don’t care.” Then he was shocked Pikachu when it was stolen.

    His problem is the exact reason GPL was created.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      59 minutes ago

      While I’m usually all for Free software (as opposed to open-source software),

      His problem is the exact reason GPL was created.

      Nah, his problem is that Microsoft has much billions of dollars and so doesn’t give a fuck about any licenses on projects by small developers. They simply ignored even the terms of the MIT license (which required MS to keep the original copyright notice, which they didn’t). GPL would’ve done squat here since it also allows for forking (by design), but also because the US legal system is cooked, and people don’t have many rights left when it comes to a dispute with a corpo.

    • custard_swollower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Stolen? It was forked as is allowed by the MIT license. With GPL as well there is no „you cannot fork” rule, you can do exactly the same thing. The author misunderstood that „you have to push the changes to upstream”, which is not in any of those licenses.