platform your streaming sites won’t go above 720p

I don’t think that’s true anymore. In Firefox you can check “play drm” and it will let you stream Netflix and others in 1080p.

Chrome and Edge on Windows do it standard.

As he described it, the Terminator is coming whether we like it or not so we need a Summer Glau.

Looks like someone already did.

Well that’s even weirder. It is in a list labeled malicious/scammer/fishing.

It absolutely isn’t any of those.

Someone else claimed it pulls resources from a botnet but if you view source, that isn’t true.

Which list? I searched the Multi Ultimate Full list and it wasn’t there.

That’s weird. I did some digging and can’t find its name, ip, or hosting company servrex.com on any block list. I checked HaGezi on github based on your post.

How it should work for 99% of websites.

https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/

Docker doesn’t require podman at all

Podman isn’t an addon for docker. Podman is the open source alternative containerizer to docker. When I first encountered Docker’s AI Bonzai buddy called Gordon, Lemmy responded with, “Lol, everyone knows to not run Docker.”

:

No, I am aguing that if you were capable of setting up Cisco BGPs in the mid-90s, when documentation was ass,

Documentation was far more thorough and accurate than today. First was everything was simpler. No VMs, No Containers. No https certificates unless they were e-commerce. The second reason is that documentation wasn’t an afterthought because the project is done by volunteers. I got a 100+ page binder from Netscape just to cover how to configure their build kit. (The software to make a customized installation CD.) Today many projects documentation consists only of, “Check out the Discord.”

The last important factor was the rate of change was slower so the documentation you got in 1996 was still completely accurate in 1999.

Edit: Re docker engine.

The guides say install docker engine and point you to the docker website. Once on the docker website, the docker documentation tells you to install the docker gui to get the engine installed and walks you through the procedure of installing docker gui.

Jellyfin but you not being able to follow a dead simple guide.

The fact that others had the same problem without solution means it isn’t follow a dead simple guide. There are multiple guides. Just setting up docker means you have to already know to not use it and run podman. Because if you follow the online guides on docker’s own website, you end up with a docker gui and their AI assistant installed.

And to think you were running a whole ass ISP…

You are arguing that setting up an Internet server is as simple as it was 30 years ago. You are arguing for the sake of arguing.

Not at Cisco. With a Cisco. I ran a mid sized ISP in the 90’s until I was bought out by a cable company and retired. Although several of my employees went on to work at Cisco. I also had a few friends who were executives at Cisco because we all started at a company working for Vint Cerf and Bob Khan (they were the angel investors) back before most knew of the Internet.

First it’s a VM because I’m not going mess around with stuff on bare metal. Create docker is a can of worms because you have to pick a reverse proxy software like nginx, traefik, caddy. Which means you need to understand all three to know which to pick. Then there’s setting up the certificate with the dns provider. So I got nginx working with a certificate but gave up after the VM running Jellyfin couldn’t see it. Googling showed someone on Reddit with the same problem but no answer other than others saying “works for me”

The start of this thread is “number one reason people don’t move to Jellyfin is ease of remote access.”

30 years ago I was compiling slackware and configuring dns servers, and setting up BGP on Ciscos. But a few hours of attempting to setup Jellyfin was a failure. It was far more complex than setting up dns/bind.

That’s fine for your personal remote access but that doesn’t help your 80 year old mother in law watch videos of the grandchildren on a Roku.

True, but then the data about me you have are useless if you only look at them.

Marketing data is always kept close by the owners but they sell access or the data would be worthless.

If the original company wants information about you, they don’t download everything from a marketing company. Like using Google, you type in your search and get a result. That search result is used and forgotten. You don’t have to download all of Google to use the results.

The 3rd party wouldn’t be fined because if you knew who they were, you could send them a Gdpr and they would respond. The problem is knowing who these companies are.

It was in beta for weeks yet it was coincidentally ready to come out of beta 18hrs after Epic.

Yeah the beta was done. But it’s awfully coincidental that they released it out of beta 18 hours after Epic.

Access to data isn’t the same as having data. You can watch a YouTube video but that doesn’t mean you downloaded it and have it.

So AI got Steam to get off their ass and update their client. Good job AI!

I don’t have any data. A third party has your data. But you don’t know that.

I never claimed that it was, quantum computers are still experimental.

Yet you linked the article that made that statement and then refuted it!

Quote from the article you linked:

https://qt.eu/applications/how-your-smartphone-uses-quantum-mechanics

Where it gives an example of how your phone uses quantum mechanics.

which was explained by Albert Einstein by introducing quanta of light,

Yes a photon. Light is photons. The light from a caveman fire is photons. I already explained that.

We sold it to a third party you’ll never find that shares it back to us for free as part of the contract we have with them.

So we don’t have any of your data.