• icegladiator@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    We already have Briar. I don’t get why Jack Dorsey is trying to get into the messaging space so hard. He also bankrolls SimpleX Chat if anyone is familiar with that platform

  • lemonuri@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    14 hours ago

    There is already a really good foss app that does exactly that, it’s called briar and is as secure and private as it gets. The downside with p2p communication apps being, that they eat your phones battery for breakfast. Still a good option for activists or journalists I think. It’s a good way to get around the “server in the middle” problem. Still more convenient to run your own (xmpp) server at home imho…

    • hietsu@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      ** for Android (and Windows/macOS/Linux) but not iOS.

      And apparently never going to be as some key component is written in Java. Other technical obstacles should be solvable (like f.ex. getting continuous running in bg by exploiting location services like iSH can do)

      • lemonuri@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Thanks, I did not realise that. So this app is for Mac to Mac communication only. If seems for briar you need to run a server still or messages will get lost between mobile users. How does this new app solve that problem? On mobile phones disconnects will happen regularly as network coverage changes and different network towers connect and disconnect when you are on the move. You might as well spin up your own xmpp server at that point, as that protocol is tried and tested for over 20 years and very lightweight and battery friendly as well…

  • Mniot@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I once did some programming on the Cybiko, a device from 2000 that could form a wireless mesh network with peers. The idea was that you could have a shopping mall full of teens and they’d be able to chat with each other from one end to the other by routing through the mesh. It was a neat device!

    • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I wanted a cybiko so bad as a teen. It seemed like it would be so cool if everyone I knew bought one. Of course no one did, but I still think they are awesome.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Have a look at meshtastic. Yes, you do have to get a separate device, but range on it can be several tens to hundreds of miles depending on the mesh density.

  • zapzap@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    If you’re in Bluetooth range can’t you chat with your mouths? Or is it for secretly chatting when you’re in a group of people? I don’t get the use case.

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s not about you being in bluetooth range of the person you want to talk to, it’s about all the people sitting in between you both that pass the message along without touching the internet.

      So you can be on a cargo ship, or on a remote island, with 20 other people and all use chat. If 1 person has internet, then you can all chat globally as well.

      It’s the same basic method of how airtags work. Everyone with an iPhone connects to the airtag and passes data to Apple. It’s just done in the background, so users don’t ever notice.

    • potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Could be useful on a plane: If you have different seats than someone and don’t want to pay for your airline’s ridiculous data prices. Although, most airlines I fly on(american, delta, air canada, united) all have free RCS/Facebook/Whatsapp, but not necessarily Signal, Telegram, Matrix, or your preferred secure service.

    • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Bluetooth ranges are quite large now.

      But an example even if someone is a foot away would be a concert or event where it’s to loud.

    • cdf12345@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I have no idea if this is correct. But imagine if you have a setup like Apple’s AirTag. Except when you receive a signal (message) you also relay it to whoever’s path you cross for the next X amount of time. The more people using the app the bigger the mesh network gets.

  • falynns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Neat idea 10 years ago “discovered” recently by a tech bro who thinks he’s the first one to think of it. He got his clicks, I guess.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Aside from the fact that he made twitter (which I blame in large part for how our political/news media landscape, as well as modern discourse, has become so thoughtless), left and made blue sky, then left blue sky and endorsed twitter?

        The dude supports a ton of toxic shit and can get entirely fucked.

  • Mahi@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’m happy to see a niche decentralized thing from Jack more than if it was another commercial start-up. And I have nothing against yet another bluetooth chat. But I’m not impressed. In the whitepaper nothing is written about spam protection, so it wouldn’t work as a reliable P2P app at scale. And the UI… It’s mere a toy for Jack’s personal nostalgia about “the good old times”. And nostalgia driven development doesn’t work in general, I would say.