• PushButton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Let’s go baby! The law is the law, and it applies to everybody

    If the “genie doesn’t go back in the bottle”, make him pay for what he’s stealing.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The law absolutely does not apply to everybody, and you are well aware of that.

    • SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I just remembered the movie where the genie was released from the bottle of a real genie, he turned the world into chaos by freeing his own kind, and if it weren’t for the power of the plot, I’m afraid people there would have become slaves or died out.

      Although here it is already necessary to file a lawsuit for theft of the soul in the literal sense of the word.

        • SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Damn, what did you watch those masterpieces on? What kind of smoke were you sitting on then? Although I don’t know what secret materials you’re talking about. Maybe I watched something wrong… And what an episode?

      • BussyCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not because they would only train on things they own which is an absolute tiny fraction of everything that everyone owns. It’s like complaining that a rich person gets to enjoy their lavish estate when the alternative is they get to use everybody’s home in the world.

          • BussyCat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            They have 0.2T in assets the world has around 660T in assets which as I said before is a tiny fraction. Obviously both hold a lot of assets that aren’t worthwhile to AI training such as theme parks but when you consider a single movie that might be worth millions or billions has the same benefit for AI training as another movie worth thousands. the amount of assets Disney owned is not nearly as relevant as you are making it out to be

            • ShadowWalker@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Until they charge people to use their AI.

              It’ll be just like today except that it will be illegal for any new companies to try and challenge the biggest players.

              • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                why would I use their AI? on top of that, wouldn’t it be in their best interests to allow people to use their AI with as few restrictions as possible in order to maximize market saturation?