• DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’s very likely that no amount of negative feedback will change anything. Why not waste some of their time anyway? Write to them, call them, spread the word. This is the only thing we can do. Even if it goes through regardless - at the very least we can make it as unpleasant as possible.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Their AI will be looking over all of the responses, not people. No important person at Google’s time will be wasted on this.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s why keywords are important. For instance I added the fact that if they continue in this course I will seek to de-Google my phones.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Like I said in another comment, unless they get tens of millions of actual unique-not-spam responses they will not even consider reconsidering. People aren’t going to de-google in any great numbers from this, because most of the people this will affect are already de-googled.

          • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Rather than degoogling telling them you will go to Apple and opt for apple services is likely the more powerful response, since that is what the regular person is more likely to do. If degoogled is used they’ll likely dismiss it assuming it is just one of those niche nerds. But an exodus to Apple is a threat that is more realistic.

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              But that makes no sense - they’ll go to someone who is even more restrictive in side loading?

              Google won’t reverse this because there’s no alternative for the relatively few people this will affect. They already don’t use Google things, and Apple don’t accomodate them. They’ve got them by the balls and they know it, which is why it’s all just empty threats even from people in here.

              • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 hour ago

                The ones that don’t sideload obviously won’t care. But the ones that do are going to have little incentive to stick around if that was the main selling point for them, and the devs for non Google play apps leave because they don’t want to hand over info to Google.

                At that point why not go to Apple if Android no longer delivers the type of sideloading experience they desire? Apple is more polished, has longer support, battery life, and better peripherals.

                And those types likely will push family to move to Apple too if they are jumping ship, since they might be the ones overseeing tech support for the family anyways.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      No humans are involved in reviewing these. They go into the memory hole and that’s that.