If the post was about themselves, saying “I am queer” is fine IMHO (as would’ve been to say “I am straight” or imply it for example by saying “I’m a man” and “I have a wife”) as that’s about that person so sharing what they feel defines them as person is the whole point and restricting mentions of one’s sexual orientation there is at best idiotic.
Had it been on a post about something Canonical or Ubuntu, in my view mentioning one’s sexual orientation would probably not have been appropriate, mainly because it would be raising an irrelevant and (sadly, in the present day) ideologically charged subject, same as it would be inappropriate to mentioning one’s political allegiance in the same context.
All in all I hope the moderator who made that mistaken moderation action has been taught the difference and been alerted to how their own internal biases are leaking into the professional sphere, which they shouldn’t.
Why does it matter if it’s impartial or not? Just go read the thread on Ubuntu discourse if you want to verify the information? It’s all there. The mod fucked up. Simple as that. It’s good that someone brought this to light.
The source for this is ultimately a social media post by someone @bark.lgbt.
Not exactly impartial.
Regardless of how impartial the source might be, there are facts there:
While Fact 3 is a bit of a relief, they still haven’t communicated what they intend to do to prevent this from happening again.
If the post was about themselves, saying “I am queer” is fine IMHO (as would’ve been to say “I am straight” or imply it for example by saying “I’m a man” and “I have a wife”) as that’s about that person so sharing what they feel defines them as person is the whole point and restricting mentions of one’s sexual orientation there is at best idiotic.
Had it been on a post about something Canonical or Ubuntu, in my view mentioning one’s sexual orientation would probably not have been appropriate, mainly because it would be raising an irrelevant and (sadly, in the present day) ideologically charged subject, same as it would be inappropriate to mentioning one’s political allegiance in the same context.
All in all I hope the moderator who made that mistaken moderation action has been taught the difference and been alerted to how their own internal biases are leaking into the professional sphere, which they shouldn’t.
Why does it matter if it’s impartial or not? Just go read the thread on Ubuntu discourse if you want to verify the information? It’s all there. The mod fucked up. Simple as that. It’s good that someone brought this to light.
Lol.
Everyone is partial or biased in some way. What’s your point? Do you seriously believe that all the information you consume is impartial?
No really, what difference it make if the source is impartial if you can verify on your own that what they said is true?
The true changes if the source is impartial or not?