• Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yes. This tech can’t replace people like some think it can. Most companies aren’t reducing head count just outsourcing.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        and only keep around a couple senior engineers, employees to manage those outsourced people, since the outsourced people may not be on par with stateside employees.

    • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s doing a shit job at replacing people, it’s still too prone to hallucinating for the vast majority of its applications.

      In many of the applications where AI has replaced people the promised performance gains never materialized because of the insane amount of babysitting a LLM agent requires.

      Doesn’t matter if it can write 10 hours of code in 5 minutes if you still need a software dev to troubleshoot the output for 25 hours.

      They have like 90% reliability (figure pulled directly from my ass) but they need 99.99% reliability to actually be effectively reliable.

      They’ve burned through all their hype and still haven’t made it reliable yet. I think they’re not going to get it done before the bubble collapses.

      It’ll be similar to the dotcom boom, infinite hype implosion collapses the market to a few core players and then those core players will get there over the next 15 years.

      Isn’t going to disappear but it’s absolutely going to fade into the background of day to day life.