• Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    You wouldn’t create a meta account. But I know I consume a lot more content than I create. Probably 1% of social media users create 80% of the content. If meta joined, the users that make most fediverse content now will see their engagement drop. There will likely not be a good reason for them to post at all since, in all likelihood, that content has already been posted by a meta user or reposted with more engagement.

    Eventually they’ll stop posting because it won’t be fun. At this point almost all content will be meta content, and most activity pub clients will be “alternative meta clients” in practice. If/When meta leaves, the fediverse will likely have a fraction of the content it has now, it’ll be a ghost town and have a long and hard road to recovery.

    That’s not to mention the other problems in the article.

    • Beemo Dinosaurierfuß@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      If meta joined, the users that make most fediverse content now will see their engagement drop.

      That’s where you lose me again.
      Why would the engagement drop if a ton more users could consume your content.

      It’s not like the ratio of content creators to lurkers is any better on meta apps than here.

      Btw thank you for the good faith discussion, I don’t think that would have happened at the old place.