• Darkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yet again, companies supposedly worth billions of dollars need their socialist handouts and free money.

      • Thorry@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve seen this format floating around for a bit. Altman has been begging for more money for years now. And he’s received it as well, but they are burning through it so fast they are always short.

  • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The original confusion stemmed from remarks made by CFO Sarah Friar, who said at a Bloomberg event that a federal “backstop” could help unlock investment for future data center expansion. Those comments, widely interpreted as a request for taxpayer guarantees, drew scrutiny given the scale of AI server costs and energy requirements.

    So basically, the company’s Chief Financial Officer explicitly stated that if the government took over the risk of loss, the company could get more money from investors who would then have nothing to lose. In other words, she was hoping for a preemptive guarantee of a bailout. Doesn’t seem to me that there was any “confusion” or misunderstanding. OpenAI wants taxpayers to bear the risk of loss, while keeping profits for itself.

  • shininghero@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Bitch you literally just bought half the world’s RAM supply. The fuck did you even need a bailout for in the first place?

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nope. Total information domination. If AI don’t tell it to us it ain’t happen.

      Anything less is the utter failball we said it was the whole time.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    So they are talking about bailouts already? Ahh, the good old ‘privatize winnings, socialize losses’ again.

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why would they need bailouts or subsidies when they are currently pulling in billions in private investments?

    This is such a bad sign.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because their burn rate only gets worse. They can’t make money with it. The only way to be profitable now is to charge $100 per prompt. They have to own the market everyone uses first.

  • ellypony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    These lazy wellfare-queen corporations need to be checked!

    The wealth will trickle upwards.