US forces have seized an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela, in a major escalation of Donald Trump’s four-month pressure campaign against the South American country’s dictator, Nicolás Maduro.

    • That Weird Vegan she/her@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Nah. The US can do what they want, but don’t those other countries DARE fall out of line. That’s why the Ukraine was forced to give up nukes, but the USA is fine to keep theirs

    • HereIAm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I don’t think there is much they can do. No one is going to want to stand up against the US in this, and any escalation from Venezuela would be incredibly costly for them. I suppose there are two things they can hope for; hope the US population throws up enough of a stink the trump changes his mind or wait for something else to come around to occupy his attention.

  • KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Now we get to the meat of the matter.

    The arabs hire trump muscle to knock off the Venezuelan government putting the arabs in charge, this gives the arabs unlimited unrestricted gulf drilling access.

    The Saudis have run out or are almost out of oil. They like making billions for doing nothing and do not want the big bucks to stop.

    So the gulf is drilled unrestricted, the oil shipped up to east Houston refineries, then shipped out to the nations paying the most for it.

    What a deal.

    When will trump start working for Americans?

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    US Navy in the Red Sea:

    We are conducting freedom of movement and trade, anti piracy operations.

    US Coast Guard in the Caribbean:

    Look at me, look at me.

    I am the pirate now.

  • kieron115@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Might not be able to buy groceries but at least we have $3.00/gallon, or $0.80/liter, fuel for our planet destroying pickup trucks!

  • itisileclerk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    USA turns into Taliban country. Taliban originaly is “political and militant organization with an ideology comprising elements of the Deobandi movement of Islamic fundamentalism and Pashtun nationalism”, now is just “political and militant organization with an ideology comprising elements of the MAGA movement of Evangelical fundamentalism and WASP nationalism”

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Taliban

      Remember when the CIA funded and armed what became the Taliban?

      Remember when the CIA had their guy running the Taliban?

        • Digit@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 minutes ago

          Oh, maybe I’m conflating the Taliban with Al-Qaeda a bit (and [for the next part of this] maybe even ISIS too a bit? idk) ~ I’m no Whitney Webb for this stuff, so do use several websearch engines likely to be honest about this stuff for yourself, but…

          Tim Osman? (Whom you may know by another name.)

          Then after that there was that guy they once called a terrorist, then put a suit on and invited to the white house… I’m terrible with names… was it… Ahmed al-Sharaa/Abu Mohammad al-Julani?

          Hard to keep track if not paying close attention.

          Hard to keep paying close attention after seeing the same old ploys and fakery played out over and over.

          “Pick up the gun”

          “You all saw him. He had a gun.”

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Time to determine on who’s command this was done, and follow down the complete chain to the bottom.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Why? The one giving the order on the top is ultimately responsible. Insubordination against king Donald of Orange the First will probably get you court martialed and hanged…

      • mPony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        22 hours ago

        not the point, though. The Cowards are using him as a shield. They have been for years. They are every bit as much to blame as he is (and he absolutely is to blame, just not the only one). Once this all falls apart they will say it was all his idea and blame him for everything, to avoid criminal repercussions. People will be so happy to see the king fall that they will give all of The Cowards immunity just to get rid of him, and the cycle will continue.

  • Matombo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    So who had written “blatent piracy” on his trump bingo card at the beginning of the year? He took almost to the very end to also make you cross out this, but he did.

    So, “nuclear test und an uninhabited island” next?

    • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      We’ll be lucky if it’s anywhere uninhabited.

      We all know he desperately wants to use the nukes for any reason he can come up with. It’s only a matter of time.

    • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      So, “nuclear test und an uninhibited island” next?

      Un inhabited?

      Edit: apparently you can’t have partial words italicized.

    • Restform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Boarding ships & enforcing sanctions is not necessarily a bad thing, albeit im missing details on this specific case.

      France & Finland have both done this to shadow fleet tankers in recent time as well.

      • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        It’s always best to make comments like this when you are missing details. /s

        • Restform@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I only said that becasue we’re ALL missing context. The shadow fleet tankers siezed by Europe happened months ago and we have a lot more context. But I left my comment intentionally open-ended incase more context comes out later.

          For now, all we know is the Trump administration seized a shadow fleet tanker that was sanctioned by the Biden administration, thereby inforcing decisions made by Biden. Europe has done the same. If you would like to add some meaningful context then please do, it’s an interesting topic.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Yes, indeed, it’s open ended and on the surface it is consistent with a plausible follow through on existing decision.

            Though the prospect of suspiciously selective enforcement comes to mind, in the midst of this very specific scenario they decide to execute a seizure that is conveniently adjacent to the boat strike operations.

        • Restform@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          wtf? Finland & France siezed Russian shadow fleet tankers, an aggressive act against the Putin regime. This vessel is also related to the axis shadow fleet.

          Supporting these shadow fleet oil tankers breaking sanctions & financing illegal wars is literally pro-russian. Seizing them is literally an act of aggression AGAINST Russia. You have it completely backwards.

          And this tanker was anyway sanctioned by Biden, Trump is now enforcing the biden administration’s sanctions.

            • Restform@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              You didn’t address anything I said. Enforcing Biden’s sanctions against Iran/Russia/NK is not pushing anyone further from the EU. The EU has literally sanctioned the Maduro government, and Norway is currently protecting the Venezuelan opposition party.

              • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Enforcing Biden’s sanctions against Iran/Russia/NK is not pushing anyone further from the EU

                I mean you are broadcasting that the US determines your foreign policy, whether that’s attractive or not depends on whether a leader’s interests are more closely aligned with America’s or the European unit as a whole.