• BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t truly understand things like this. Most DE’s are similar enough to Windows that anyone who’s spent a minute on a computer should be able to intuitively get to a web browser to surf the web. That’s what most people do. Word processing and the likes is tough since most are ingrained in Office, but something like (pukes in mouth) Google sheets is decently popular and good enough for most people.

    If you give most someone a computer with a browser and auto updates, they’ll be able to do almost everything they are already doing on Windows with minimal thought.

    There are exceptions, but those people suck at Windows already, so it’s a moot point. If you can’t find the start menu in Windows, it doesn’t matter what OS you’re using.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s not about ease of use. Remember Windows RT? It worked exactly like normal Windows and it still died because people didn’t understand what it is and were confused but the limitations. Making Linux as similar to Windows as possible is not a solution for the masses. It works for people that understand what they are doing or have someone who does at hand. Normal Windows user will just try to install Word and download exe files and be confused that they don’t work. If you want normal users to use Linux you need to make it clear that it’s something different, like OS X or Chrome OS does. You basically need a major OEM to create immutable Linux distro with clear branding and offer commercial support for it. Android for Desktop basically which will be very similar to Chrome OS.

    • Peffse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      funny you should say it like that. I just recently I tried using Debian’s default GNOME desktop and thought I had corrupted the install somehow. I reinstalled the OS two more times because it kept dumping me into a nearly blank screen with no obvious buttons to click aside network/sound/power.

      I’m used to LXDE, KDE, and Cinnamon, so this was completely foreign to me… and trying to find the web browser had me at a caveman level of confusion.

      • GrapheneOSRuinedMyPixel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        That’s strange - vanilla gnome should start in overview mode and dash is populated with gnome apps by default. Aside from that, there’s a button in the upper left corner that goes into overview if you press it.

        Maybe your install did get corrupted, because literally my grandma could figure it out. On the other hand, most mainstream distros ship with dash to dock and discoverability must be the reason.

      • myplacedk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Debian was not a great choise, it is not for beginners. I wonder why you chose that one.

        If you want to try again, I recommend using a distribution that is recommended for beginners. For example Ubuntu.

        • Kernal64@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It’s people with attitudes such as yours that give Linux a bad name. Your response to someone who’s just told you that they’re used to 3 different Linux DEs is that they must be a beginner and should use a beginner distro is the height of arrogance. The person you responded to is clearly not a beginner, and that’s the response you have for them when they share their totally valid experience? Shameful.

        • ranzispa@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I do agree: Debian can be a bit tedious to set up and upgrade at times. It would not be my choice if you had to install a Linux distribution for the first time with no help. But, if you were able to set it up then you’re good, no reason to change now.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Only Office has a UI very similar to Word. I generally prefer LibreOffice for its functionality, but Only Office has an easy layout for Word users to learn.

      • GriffinClaw@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        Seconding Only Office. I had a few docs I needed to print in a hurry, and Libreoffice kept corrupting the fonts/text format. OnlyOffice worked clean.

        • Deckname@olio.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Still looks and feels nothing like microshit office. For this, onlyoffice definitely has the upper hand.