• jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    38 minutes ago

    Well yeah, I would assume Steam would be a big priority for this scenario…

  • Pokexpert30 🌓@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I don’t mind DE to have a windows-mimicking workflow (cinnamon, KDE kinda) but modding Gnome to mimick windows is not great because it causes weird bug and maintenance issues. Aka it breaks easily and gives bad impressions to the user

  • 4shtonButcher@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Installed Mint on two aging family laptops. One is smoothly running 00s era games already and i barely needed to help the family member with that.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I like the headline… former Windows users are picking up Steam on Linux, because it’s pretty much indistinguishable from Steam on Windows.

  • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Microsoft’s ecosystem has been slowly pushing some users toward the exit. Hardware requirements for Windows 11 left millions of perfectly functional PCs behind. Ads on the Start menu and in system notifications have frustrated many. And for gamers, launcher problems, forced reboots and background processes that siphon resources have driven a search for alternatives.

    No shit? That’s crazy.

  • Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It will take some serious, I hate to say it, YouTube campaigning and such to make Linux a more mainstream thought in the public’s brain.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Problem is Youtube is known to censor these kind of campaigns. I think they literally got caught delisting Tiny11 tutorials recently. Imagine what they‘ll do if Linux Tutorials pick up steam. Big tech is one giant illegal syndicate and politicians have invested in all of them.

      • Zephorah@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Is there another venue? Nebula doesn’t seem keen on DIY and anything not free is going to have an incredibly reduced audience. The people who need the info most are the least likely to be able to afford another sub.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      9 hours ago

      What it takes is people being able to buy a Linux machine at the local electronics store. Installing your OS yourself is still a major hurdle for most people.

        • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The Deck probably looks too toylike for many people. The GabeCube might really make an impact, if the price is right.

          • zerozaku@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I’m afraid price won’t be right or I have to say it’s hard for to it to be right when pc components are soaring in prices. They just ran into a bad timing.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That is an important step, yes.

        However another important step is that the default distro needs to basically not even highlight that terminal exists.

        If you’re trying to learn how to use linux, and step 1 of the tutorial is “open terminal”, you will lose 97% of your new install base. Then headlines will flood that linux machines are being returned in high numbers.

        As much as you guys hate to hear this, the first experience for a new linux user needs to be intuitive. Before they even turn the machine on, they have to know how to use this software. Not because they are experts, but because the space and experience guides itself.

        Then as you learn, you can customize a bit more, and from there linux can become a rabbit hole. But the point is, let the individual user control the depths which they dive. Because I suspect 90%+ won’t even change the desktop background. And thats ok.

        Make it easy for the dummies, but then you individually can tinker if you want to. And it’s linux, so…ya know. Go nuts. But some people don’t want to do all that tinkering. That vanilla experience is what gets remembered to represent that OS. Even if you customized it and experienced it very differently.

          • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            56 minutes ago

            But its very unfamiliar for people coming from Windows. That said, ZorinOS does a very good job of reworking it to look and act like Windows, KDE, cinnamon or previous versions of Gnome.

        • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          That’s where I think Bazzite really shines… I didn’t need the terminal to setup all of the normal stuff at all, and new apps I discovered right from the start menu so I didn’t need to go far at all.

    • nil@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      And soon there would be a corpo that will make a closed source commercial OS based on Linux and people will somehow use their crap.

    • B-TR3E@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      It might. I just don’t see any use in it. Says a former Linux advocate. Don’t get me wrong, I’m writing this on a Debian stable machine, I’d never even think of using anything else for a daily driver and have been doing so for 25 years, but Windows users will be Windows users and I don’t see any reason to adapt Linux to their needs. Or to that bundle of vague illusions that they believe to be what they need. The evolution of Windows has produced such a horrible, parasitic product that its’ users don’t see any other way now than to jump ship. They’re mostly lost cases, IMO.

  • BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t truly understand things like this. Most DE’s are similar enough to Windows that anyone who’s spent a minute on a computer should be able to intuitively get to a web browser to surf the web. That’s what most people do. Word processing and the likes is tough since most are ingrained in Office, but something like (pukes in mouth) Google sheets is decently popular and good enough for most people.

    If you give most someone a computer with a browser and auto updates, they’ll be able to do almost everything they are already doing on Windows with minimal thought.

    There are exceptions, but those people suck at Windows already, so it’s a moot point. If you can’t find the start menu in Windows, it doesn’t matter what OS you’re using.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s not about ease of use. Remember Windows RT? It worked exactly like normal Windows and it still died because people didn’t understand what it is and were confused but the limitations. Making Linux as similar to Windows as possible is not a solution for the masses. It works for people that understand what they are doing or have someone who does at hand. Normal Windows user will just try to install Word and download exe files and be confused that they don’t work. If you want normal users to use Linux you need to make it clear that it’s something different, like OS X or Chrome OS does. You basically need a major OEM to create immutable Linux distro with clear branding and offer commercial support for it. Android for Desktop basically which will be very similar to Chrome OS.

    • Peffse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      funny you should say it like that. I just recently I tried using Debian’s default GNOME desktop and thought I had corrupted the install somehow. I reinstalled the OS two more times because it kept dumping me into a nearly blank screen with no obvious buttons to click aside network/sound/power.

      I’m used to LXDE, KDE, and Cinnamon, so this was completely foreign to me… and trying to find the web browser had me at a caveman level of confusion.

      • GrapheneOSRuinedMyPixel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        That’s strange - vanilla gnome should start in overview mode and dash is populated with gnome apps by default. Aside from that, there’s a button in the upper left corner that goes into overview if you press it.

        Maybe your install did get corrupted, because literally my grandma could figure it out. On the other hand, most mainstream distros ship with dash to dock and discoverability must be the reason.

      • myplacedk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Debian was not a great choise, it is not for beginners. I wonder why you chose that one.

        If you want to try again, I recommend using a distribution that is recommended for beginners. For example Ubuntu.

        • Kernal64@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It’s people with attitudes such as yours that give Linux a bad name. Your response to someone who’s just told you that they’re used to 3 different Linux DEs is that they must be a beginner and should use a beginner distro is the height of arrogance. The person you responded to is clearly not a beginner, and that’s the response you have for them when they share their totally valid experience? Shameful.

        • ranzispa@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I do agree: Debian can be a bit tedious to set up and upgrade at times. It would not be my choice if you had to install a Linux distribution for the first time with no help. But, if you were able to set it up then you’re good, no reason to change now.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Only Office has a UI very similar to Word. I generally prefer LibreOffice for its functionality, but Only Office has an easy layout for Word users to learn.

      • GriffinClaw@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        32 minutes ago

        Seconding Only Office. I had a few docs I needed to print in a hurry, and Libreoffice kept corrupting the fonts/text format. OnlyOffice worked clean.

        • Deckname@olio.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Still looks and feels nothing like microshit office. For this, onlyoffice definitely has the upper hand.

  • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    So… just like… KDE?

    Not that it is designed for it but it is a similar workflow and should be familiar to Windows users