China launched its most extensive war games around Taiwan on Monday to showcase Beijing’s ability to cut off the island from outside support in a conflict, testing Taipei’s resolve to defend itself and its arsenal of U.S.-made weapons.

The Eastern Theatre Command said it had deployed troops, warships, fighter jets and artillery for its “Justice Mission 2025” exercises to encircle the democratically governed island, conduct live fire and simulated strikes on land and sea targets, and drills to blockade Taiwan’s main ports.

The live-firing exercises will continue on Tuesday across a record seven zones designated by China’s Maritime Safety Administration, making the drills the largest to date by total coverage and in areas closer to Taiwan than previous exercises. The military had initially said artillery firing would be confined to five zones.

      • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The post literally says:

        China launched its most extensive war games around Taiwan on Monday to showcase Beijing’s ability to cut off the island from outside support in a conflict

        Cutting Taiwan from US support in case of conflict is famously NOT invasion, it’s defense against US attacks.

            • papertowels@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              So we’re in agreement with the obvious fact that China is running drills to cut off Taiwan from external aid in case it has a conflict with Taiwan, right?

              • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 hours ago

                In response to Taiwan buying $11bn in US weapons, China carries out a military exercise in which it simulates a Taiwan encirclement to prevent it from US military involvement, yes

                • papertowels@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  US military involvement in case of what?

                  We gotta make sure this passes the clown captcha test. Otherwise it has the same energy as “the American civil war was just for states rights”

                  • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    In case of military conflict between Taiwan and China, what’s your point? You just assume that it’s a Chinese military invasion of Taiwan because you’re a propagandized westerner, but it could very well be an economic blockade of the China sea by US + regional puppets

        • lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Sure, buddy… And Russia is also just defending themselves from NATO by invading Ukraine.

          Even Xi said, he wants to rule Taiwan, if necessary, with military force, so please quit the bullshit… Thanks.

          • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Even Xi said, he wants to rule Taiwan, if necessary, with military force

            Can you provide a source for this? I’m very interested

            • zbyte64@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Honestly it’s a reading between the lines. Xi says:

              We will uphold the one-China principle and the 1992 Consensus, and advance peaceful national reunification. All of us, compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, must come together and move forward in unison. We must take resolute action to utterly defeat any attempt toward “Taiwan independence,” and work together to create a bright future for national rejuvenation. No one should underestimate the resolve, the will, and the ability of the Chinese people to defend their national sovereignty and territorial integrity.

              https://www.cfr.org/blog/what-xi-jinpings-major-speech-means-taiwan

              The “peaceful reunification” is aspirational, not practical. The practical is “take resolute action to utterly defeat any attempt toward ‘Taiwan independence’” and we see that with this military action. Consensus among CCP members is that peaceful reunification is unlikely to happen and that military force will be required (see the book “Leadership and the Rise of Great Powers” by a member of the CCP).

              • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                10 hours ago

                So, he absolutely did NOT say that, huh, whaddya know!

                The literal words of Xi Jinping: “advance peaceful national reunification”

                Lemmy libs: “[he] said he wants to rule Taiwan, if necessary, with military force”

                • zbyte64@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  Like I said, I recommend reading literature on the matter from CCP members to get more context on the matter. It won’t help you shit post for karma but it does help one make sense of things.

                  • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    10 hours ago

                    Literature on the matter from CCP members is irrelevant to the original claim that “Xi Jinping said he wants to rule Taiwan, if necessary, with military force”, though. You can make excuses for disinformation if you want because it suits your point of view, but that’s literally false.

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Oh, so like when the USA does the same to Venezuela and Cuba it’s just self defense like Trump says?

      • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Both sides can be bad, doesn’t mean both sides are equally bad. China hasn’t carried out a military action in 4 decades.

        • GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          So they should get to annex one little country, as a treat? Lol

          (Also depending how you define military action, thats false. They keep having border scuffles with India for starters.)

          • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            But China has not annexed Taiwan, you’re talking in hypotheticals. If China invades Taiwan tomorrow, maybe we can discuss that, but as of now China hasn’t done anything like that.

            • GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              “I’m not touching you! I’m not touching you!”

              “I’m just commenting the letter N. I don’t know what the next commenter might reply!”

              “No, of course our reactor needs pure uranium. But it’s for peaceful purposes.”

              By your logic, really you shouldn’t complain no matter how close our vastly superior stealth bombers fly to that shitty dam.

              • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                China is literally doing this in response to Taiwan escalating by purchasing $11bn in US weapons, it’s specified on the article itself. China did not start this

                • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  Gee. I wonder why you’d suddenly buy weapons…maybe because you’re being threatened by the neighboring country?

                  • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    13 hours ago

                    Just to make sure you’re logically consistent: you support North Korea’s policy of strong militarization in defense against US + SK? Or is this something you reserve to US allies?

    • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The amount of anti-China programming in this comments section is crazy. Thanks for setting the record straight