• plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I wouldn’t mind to be wrong but nobody who is making your point has named the transgression that Republicans would use to impeach her, nor had there ever been somebody during the election campaign who had mentioned that the campaign was useless because Harris would be impeached anyway.

    Trump is worse, but Harris would fight the same wars because the president is a figurehead and politics is made by the lobbyists.

    • Velypso@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Look man,

      I understand what youre getting at, but i dont have time to explain the difference between a clinton bj and a harris land invasion and the 30 years of political polarization that allows us to be here.

      So kindly fuck off and stop pretending like you know what youre talking about.

      Its also real cute you think you got me for some reason.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        but i dont have time to explain the difference between a clinton bj and a harris land invasion

        That’s not the question. Why would the Republicans try an impeachment for an invasion if the Republicans obviously want that war. You also have to explain how they could get 67 votes for a successful impeachment.

        Who is the influencer that is spreading the idea? It’s surprising how many democrats believe it since cooperation from democrats is needed for it to succeed.