• gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s great but if you have a lower end one (and maybe higher end - not sure what they’re doing recently tbh), it may try to sniff out unsecured or public access SSIDs to connect without your knowledge or consent and transmit metrics and metadata anyways.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        We use a Linux media computer for all our watching, the TV is used as nothing more than a simple monitor. So if our TV does that, jokes on them, because all the metrics they can get is when we turn it on and off and that we watch through HDMI at the TV max resolution. 🤣🤣🤣

        I stopped watching traditional TV 25 years ago, 2nd best decision I ever made, after marrying my wife. 😀

        • nkat2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Same here, friend! Same here!

          We use a Linux minicomputer as the driver.

          On not watching TV: I stopped around 22 years ago. It feels so good.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        There would be nothing for one to connect to out here. There’s no WiFi except mine and no cell service unless you go outside.
        I would probably desolder the antenna if I was in the city though.

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        If this is a concern, connecting to a decoy SSID that isn’t actually connected to the internet may be the play.

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          If the device (TV) in question is doing sketchy things like sniffing for open wireless networks, I don’t think pointing it manually at a zero-access WAP stub is going to stop it - it’ll probably just dump that connection and look for another one that works.

          • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            So what would you suggest as a countermeasure? In theory rendering the on-board wifi inoperable would work, but this requires an actual alteration to the device and some technical knowledge on how to do so without damaging the TV itself.

            Edit: in addition to privacy issues, this sort of behavior would be an actual cybersecurity risk.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Testing the connectivity of your connection is trivial, and the system could easily try to find another of you had no access.