But no one has ever said they use redhat when they use centOS or fedora. That doesnt happen on other distros they just say the distro they use. Obviously its not a big deal but it is cringe and all the responses from people twisting themselves into knots trying to defend it is even more cringe.
Anyways, if a person uses Arch, is switching to Endeavor beneficial? Will it be more convenient or feel restrictive?
That depends, if you can configure arch then no because it will only add things you’ll want to remove. If you cant then its nice to have maintainers to configure and maintain your distro for you.
I just updated my OS and all my issues were from Hyprland working afterwards. I guess if the WM is going to be the issue every time, maybe I might try Sway or something rather than and an easier OS.
But no one has ever said they use redhat when they use centOS or fedora. That doesnt happen on other distros they just say the distro they use. Obviously its not a big deal but it is cringe and all the responses from people twisting themselves into knots trying to defend it is even more cringe.
That depends, if you can configure arch then no because it will only add things you’ll want to remove. If you cant then its nice to have maintainers to configure and maintain your distro for you.
I just updated my OS and all my issues were from Hyprland working afterwards. I guess if the WM is going to be the issue every time, maybe I might try Sway or something rather than and an easier OS.