The article title is click bait here is the full article:

Wondering what your career looks like in our increasingly uncertain, AI-powered future? According to Palantir CEO Alex Karp, it’s going to involve less of the comfortable office work to which most people aspire, a more old fashioned grunt work with your hands.

Speaking at the World Economic Forum yesterday, Karp insisted that the future of work is vocational — not just for those already in manufacturing and the skilled trades, but for the majority of humanity.

In the age of AI, Karp told attendees at a forum, a strong formal education in any of the humanities will soon spell certain doom.

“You went to an elite school, and you studied philosophy; hopefully you have some other skill,” he warned, adding that AI “will destroy humanities jobs.”

Karp, who himself holds humanities degrees from the elite liberal arts institutions of Haverford College and Stanford Law, will presumably be alright. With a net worth of $15.5 billion — well within the top 0.1 percent of global wealth owners — the Palantir CEO has enough money and power to live like a feudal lord (and that’s before AI even takes over.)

The rest of us, he indicates, will be stuck on the assembly line, building whatever the tech companies require.

“If you’re a vocational technician, or like, we’re building batteries for a battery company… now you’re very valuable, if not irreplaceable,” Karp insisted. “I mean, y’know, not to divert to my usual political screeds, but there will be more than enough jobs for the citizens of your nation, especially those with vocational training.”

Now, there’s nothing wrong with vocational work or manufacturing. The global economy runs on these jobs. But in a theoretical world so fundamentally transformed by AI that intellectual labor essentially ceases to exist, it’s telling that tech billionaires like Karp see the rest of humanity as their worker bees.

It seems that the AI revolution never seems to threaten those who stand to profit the most from it — just the 99.9 percent of us building their batteries.

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    52 minutes ago

    Are they stupid as fuck? On the knowledge of whom does he think their models are trained? Idiotic thieves.

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    42 minutes ago

    if working with my hands like a peasant paid what my job does, I’d do it in a heartbeat. fuck this mental exhaustion and stress, I’d rather be working the field eight hours a day for the same pay

    AI is not coming for my job, which leads me to believe it’s not coming for that many other ‘skilled’ jobs

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Didn’t Ford’s CEO just say they wanted highschool graduates who could do math to be automotive techs making $120K a year?

    Plumbers already make ridiculous amounts of money because there aren’t enough of them.

    The median age in my field 5-10 years ago was 55 years old and we aren’t getting an influx of new A&P licensed techs still. The main way the Aviation industry gets it’s techs these days is the military and that’s not even a sure fire way.

    Like. CEO’s doing trades when? Because he’s clearly mistaken if he thinks that it’s not going to be CEO’s and upper management people who get their jobs replaced by AI.

    They keep trying to replace engineers, software devs and so on with AI at all the tech companies and then having to back out of that decision to keep things running.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      CEOs will not be replaced any time soon, because they’re all in each other companies board and they’ll stand for each other (or more exactly from setting examples that could apply to them).

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Hey grok, what’s the most efficient, yet emotionally satisfying way to liquidate our class of parasitic, pedophilic billionaires. Extra points for style!

  • fartographer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Maybe they saw too many of us identifying that the biggest problem is the rich, rather than each other, so they’re trying to hide behind a new manufactured enemy.

    • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Ironically us plebs who work with our hands are the people with the skill set necessary to build those things.

      • matlag@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        54 minutes ago

        And their goal is to make sure you can’t do anything without THEIR tools/plants, so that you don’t escape from their control.

        Imagine we all work with our hands but decide we’ll only sell what we produce to our local communities and not large corporates.

      • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        And most jobs are manual labour. That guy wants to seem like he’s making an intelligent prediction about a supposed new paradigm shift for Humanity, but ends up just stating the status quo since a job is a job.

    • Siegfried@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      And we will do it with our own hands… he was right… he was right from the very start

  • termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    comfortable office work to which most people aspire

    What ? Do people even aspire to work in the first place ? And idk about you, but I’d rather have been a craftswoman if you could still live off of that.

    You went to an elite school, and you studied philosophy; hopefully you have some other skill

    You think AI can do PHILOSOPHY !? AI can barely put together one fucking function when coding, and you think it can do philosophy ? Either he’s knowingly lying (he is) or he understands so little about philosophy that the AI can fool him (probably also true)

    • Bongles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I’ve had a conversation with one of my friends a few times. Even if she was filthy rich she would still work. People always claim various things like getting bored or needing something to do or wanting purpose.

      I would find plenty to do without working and her take on it blows my mind. In fact every argument I’ve heard from people in general, my response (at least in my head) is that I could still accomplish that thing without employment.

      I can keep myself entertained doing the things I enjoy, I can find purpose helping people with my boatloads of cash, I would have time to learn all kinds of new skills. I could start businesses to handle some niche ethically, if the main players are scummy. The possibilities are damn near endless and if I’m ever rich, I’m not going to continue spending my time making some other prick richer.

  • LucidNightmare@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Sorry, buddy. I’ll burn down your fucking offices and data centers before I go back to manual labor.

    I didn’t do 15 years of manual labor just to go back to that shit after I finally got out.

    • segabased@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      What’s crazy is how fragile their ai ecosystem is. The tech requires insane scaling in the form of data centers. We’ve hit the Moore’s law limit, this tech isn’t getting better in and of itself, it just gets better by adding more tpus and servers.

      It all goes down if the data centers go down

  • spacesatan@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Notable that it’s the author of the article calling people peasants and talking down to workers, not Karp.

    Fuck you Joe Wilkins. I hope Karp is right and you have to work with your hands like ‘a peasant’ in your words. You might have to do something useful for society instead of writing ragebait for Futurism.