• ThoGot@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    To be honest my SO has an older MacBook and using that a couple of times convinced me to absolutely never buy one myself (regarding the os).
    I had to google the most basic functions which you can achieve with a right click on other systems


    It seems people don’t like my dislike of MacOS lol

    • Creegz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      MacOS has a different methodology but the idea is most applications do things the exact same way every time, the menu at the top is standardized across software. Take some time to familiarize yourself with basic usage and then just fire up a new program and you’ll see what I mean. Keyboard shortcuts in apps are always the same for the same function. They’re easily accessible. Alt+f4 is fucking not, command+q is. Command+space to search for anything. That existed before MS implemented search in the taskbar. It’s got its ups and downs, but the OS is really tailored to make things accessible.

      The reason it’s so wildly different from windows is partly due to a Microsoft going patent crazy on design and ui elements to try and monopolize home computing. Technically a “desktop” is their patent, which is why it’s called a workspace in every other OS. They also have been sued by Microsoft in the past over UX things.

    • M137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s surely just you not understanding that the real problem is that you don’t know how to use it while you do know how to use whatever you’re comparing it to.

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      MacOS doesn’t work exactly like Windows? The hell you say!

      You know you’ve got a bad take when someone who doesn’t even like Apple is making fun of you. Just saying.