• poopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’ve always thought this is such a generalist scenario, meant to deliberately portray all men as dangerous and categorically make them look bad. Imagine we swapped out “men” for another group of people.

    • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      If you actually listened to the reasoning that women gave (crazy, right?), they were very clear that with a bear, you know where you stand, but with men, you can’t tell right away whether they’re a danger or pretending to be nice only to be harmful later on.

      Any men who get offended by this fact is part of the problem.

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      meant to deliberately portray all men as dangerous

      If this were true, wouldn’t it be dead simple for women to just pick the man? It’s interesting that a lot don’t, right?

      • poopkins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 minutes ago

        Swap the word “man” for another group of people based on generic traits and continue your sweeping generalizations.

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Because most people have a Disneyfied idea of what animals do. Most people think a bear in the woods wears a red t-shirt and carries around a honeypot.