![](https://media.kbin.social/media/a8/91/a891790864d4f3fc56ef28e4a12b98c56e096ff2b719c95a7f36b3dfc8046298.png)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/8140dda6-9512-4297-ac17-d303638c90a6.png)
The people saying that are just pushing some other product in you.
The people saying that are just pushing some other product in you.
My guess is that you have Docker configured incorrectly. Its internal IP range probably overlaps with your real network, so all requests are routed to Docker. Uninstall docker and reboot the server. If that works, reinstall docker and properly configure its internal networking.
deleted by creator
Distro maintainers are a lot better about keeping libraries up-to-date than random application developers. They will even patch applications to work on newer libraries, even when the app developers do not.
There’s also auditability. If e.g. OpenSSL (or some other library) gets a high rated CVE and Debian ships a same-day patch, I know I am safe. I can verify that I have installed the patched version, and I know my applications use that patched version. Not with flatpak. Now I’m at the mercy of a dozen app developers, many of which probably value security less than the Debian Security team.
IMHO it’s a mistake for Fedora to drop its own packages for flatpak. But Fedora appears just to be a RedHat experiments playground these days, not a user focussed distro.
Don’t get me wrong, Flatpak is fine if you want to install stuff from Joe Random Developer off the internet, but I trust the Debian maintainers a whole lot more. If they ship it, i can trust it.
deleted by creator
Distro native packages are:
If an application is new or niche or small then flatpak is definitely a good option. But if there’s a distro native package then that one is almost always the better option. Flatpak is nice for when there is no native package.
Only install flatpacks if the distro repository doesn’t have the application in question. But I agree about snaps. Never ever use snap packages.
There are plenty of public toilets that charge a small fee. Train stations and airports for example. Also at gas stations it’s pretty common. But I have never seen it at a restaurant or bar. Maybe sometimes there’s a sign that says it’s 50 cents for non-customers or something. But never for customers.
PHP has PSR-1, PSR-2 and now the updated PSR-12: https://www.php-fig.org/psr/psr-12/
There is no cloud. Only someone else’s computer.
From the title of the screenshot I was sure it was going to be about daemons.
Debian stable has newer packages than Ubuntu LTS. Debian has pretty regular releases these days.
Why not move to Debian? Ubuntu was born in a time when Debian stable had a really long release cycle and wasn’t desktop ready. But times have changed. Debian is a great desktop without all of Canonical’s Ubuntu “experiments” like snap.
Too bad the alternatives suck so much. Vimeo used to be nice. I don’t know where they went wrong.
RMS doesn’t disagree with OSI about the open source definition. He just thinks his Free Software definition is better. But RMS would most certainly not call “source available” software “open source”
Because the OSI has been defining and stewarding open source for 25 years. It is the de facto definition and has been recognised as such by multiple governments around the world. Anyone trying to muddy the waters is probably trying to sell you their “source available” software as open source.
Most organisations and individuals that disagree with their definition are trying to sell you source available software as open source.
If it’s not OSI approved then it’s not open source. I hate it when companies try to dilute the open source moniker. This is “source available”
I like gnome. My only gripe is that workspaces should be per-screen. But all Linux DEs aside from a few isoteric tiling WMs get that wrong.