thehatfox@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoICANN approves use of .internal domain for your networkwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square151fedilinkarrow-up1499arrow-down15cross-posted to: homelab@lemmit.online
arrow-up1494arrow-down1external-linkICANN approves use of .internal domain for your networkwww.theregister.comthehatfox@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square151fedilinkcross-posted to: homelab@lemmit.online
minus-squarefine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cclinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoNo one is saying it is their job. Merely that using a TLD like .internal requires some consideration regarding ssl certificates.
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·1 month agoBut why are people even discussing that? This is about an ICANN decision. TLS has nothing to do with that. Also you don’t really need TLS for self hosting. You can if you want though.
minus-squarefine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cclinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoBecause people can discuss whatever they like? If you don’t like it just down vote it.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoPeople can talk about whatever they want whenever they want. The discussion naturally went to the challenges of getting non-self-signed certificates for this new TLD. That’s all.
No one is saying it is their job.
Merely that using a TLD like .internal requires some consideration regarding ssl certificates.
But why are people even discussing that?
This is about an ICANN decision. TLS has nothing to do with that. Also you don’t really need TLS for self hosting. You can if you want though.
Because people can discuss whatever they like?
If you don’t like it just down vote it.
People can talk about whatever they want whenever they want. The discussion naturally went to the challenges of getting non-self-signed certificates for this new TLD. That’s all.