Apple has called for the European Commission to repeal a swathe of technology legislation, warning that unless it is amended the company could stop shipping some products and services to the 27-country bloc.

The Silicon Valley company hit out in a submission to the commission’s review of the three-year-old anti-monopoly legislation, which is intended to regulate the gatekeeper power of the largest digital companies including search engines, app providers and messaging services.

It said it had already delayed the launch of features such as live translation through AirPods and mirroring iPhone screens on to laptop because of the act’s demands for interoperability with non-Apple products and services.

“The DMA means the list of delayed features in the EU will probably get longer, and our EU users’ experience on Apple products will fall further behind,” it said. Apple added that Brussels was creating unfair competition as the rules were not applied to Samsung, the largest smartphone provider in the EU.

  • Raccoonn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    Knowing Apple, they’ll probably find a way to ‘comply’ that feels more like a loophole than a solution…

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      knowing the EU they are probably gonna fold and let apple do what it pleases.

  • Devolution@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 days ago

    Apple wouldn’t stop. They need that money too much. Also, Europe is OK with going Huawei if Google and Apple keep up with their shit.

    • NotKyloRen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      Came here to say the same. It’s an empty threat. After all this is famously the company who made dual physical SIM iPhones for China and other Asian regions because eSIM isn’t/wasn’t legal.

    • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Europe is OK with going Huawei if Google and Apple keep up with their shit.

      They should be OK with going Huawei and Xioami, but unfortunately they really want to remain America’s faithful dogs.

  • oyzmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    Big tech only cares about money, something that makes them very predictable. Very high fines and banning costs them money, so they will comply to all demands to avoid. Easy as that :)

  • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 days ago

    Apple sold well over $10 billion worth of Iphones in the EU in 2024, but rather than deal with the annoyance of EU regulation they’re just going to take their ball and go home.

    They must think EU regulators are imbeciles.

    • crimsonpoodle@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      Or they think the people in the EU will do mass protests if they don’t get their product— forcing the regulators hands; maybe because of what happened with tiktok in Nepal— missing the nuance of the political and economic factors there however.

      • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        And Apple shareholders will revolt if Apple revenues drop by $10 billion because they’re having a tantrum. I hope EU regulators call Apple’s bluff. The U.S. is a corporate hellscape, the EU doesn’t have to be.

  • falseWhite@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    They’re just bluffing, they’d lose more money by withdrawing from the EU market, than finding ways to comply. Greedy corporations are easy to predict, since their only goal is money and they don’t do things “out of principle”.

  • egrets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I like my iPhone. It’s solid hardware and reasonably capable software. It does everything I need it to do, and gives me really solid control over API access to privacy-centric controls like location and microphone.

    I still wouldn’t skip a beat to switch to another phone manufactured by another company (though I regret how much of a duopoly there is). The inconvenience is minor; Apple just needs to give me a shove and I’ll switch.

  • 🇨🇦 tunetardis@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    Among the requirements of the DMA is that Apple ensures that headphones made by other brands will work with iPhones. It said this has been a block on it releasing its live translation service in the EU as it allows rival companies to access data from conversations, creating a privacy problem.

    I’m not really understanding this. Where is the privacy problem? What is different with airpods that solves this? At the end of the day, are they not just bluetooth headphones? Do they add some extra security layer beyond what bluetooth itself offers?

    • Sirdubdee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      For real. It’s not like the processing power is done through the headphones. If they can act like a microphone and speaker, that’s all you should need.

  • DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Who cares? The average EU citizen will benefit far more from the regulation. I don’t think any of their laws have been bad so far, mostly requiring standard connectors, requiring user access to install what they want without apples permission, and monopolizing software stores in general. This might be a great opportunity to actually get some consumer friendly competition out of Europe for once. Also Samsung already allows third party app stores, has USB C like every other modern device, and allows side loading. It’s going to get interesting once Google starts complaining that they can’t control users devices after they buy them as well with their upcoming ban on non Google approved software installations.

  • themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    They need us (our money). We dont even like them enough to not replace them the second they go away.