• yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Maybe English should just get rid of the stupid “the first consonant is silent when two consonants form the beginning of a word” rule tbf.

    It’s a skill issue to mispronounce loan words (like gnome, pterodactyl or psychology).

      • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I was already an adult when I learned that “salmon” is supposed to be pronounced as “sammon”.

          • Emotional (he/him)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            ah, I was wondering because, in comparison to my native tongue (French), I’ve found English significantly more intuitive. I may be biased though, or French may just be another mongrel of a language 😅

            My uneducated feeling so far is that most languages weren’t developed with particularly logical rules, and rules were added retroactively, and as such, most languages are ugly amalgamations, but English gets some of the worst rep because of its dominance on the internet.

      • Greddan@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s just every language once you get into it. English is a fairly standard north germanic language. There’s been a lot of mythology built around it over the years which often leads to misunderstandings, especially from monolinguals who simply have nothing to compare to.

          • Greddan@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            The German language is ironically one of the weirder Germanic languages. When I say North Germanic languages I mostly mean what is now known as Scandinavian languages (and sometimes Dutch depending on who you ask).

              • Greddan@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                I think they’ve been on the ball with spelling reforms as the language has evolved. The last one as recently as in 1996. English has no central authority for spelling, making such reforms much harder to implement. Conservatives are of course, like always, a problem. Being against any and all spelling reform. The main argument seem to be that it makes it harder for people to read really old texts in their original form. Which for some reason makes spelling and speach drifting apart worth it. I known Swedish conservative pseudo-intellectuals often praise the English for it’s lack of reform.

                • lad@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Besides, they say ‘read really old texts’ as if this is easily achieved right now, which it is not

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Snail, small, three, press, change. I could keep going.

      I’ve never heard of that rule. There are a few combos that are basically always that way though: pt, gn, and kn come to mind.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        And then there are the cases where two consonants combine to form another sound entirely: ph, ch, sh, th.