The arrest of a senior military figure who allegedly leaked footage purporting to show Palestinian prisoners being abused has shocked Israel and ignited a major political row.
You don’t think about 47% to 64% of the population holding a position counts as widespread? Then I guess your 69% favoring getting hostages back over continuing the in the here and now aren’t widespread either.
It’s always strange how like a day after I block someone…
I get replies from accounts who haven’t been active in months, suddenly jump in and want to continue an argument for the account I stopped replying to.
Benefit of the doubt, why would you think I wanted to continue this after I stopped replying to people?
My last post was yesterday so I don’t know what you are talking about inactivity. It may be that you don’t see them due to language filters I guess.
I came across your comment which seemed to display either a severe misunderstanding or egregious bad faith. I wanted to call it out while making it clear why your comment was so wrong. Whether you want to continue the conversation is up to you. If you do, that’s great, if you don’t then my comment is there for others stumbling across it like I did.
I gave you the benefit of the doubt with your last trolly comment because we’ve had good exchanges in the past but i’ll bow out of this conversation now.
Is there a word for this? It’s not exactly a strawman cause that would involve creating a separate argument to win. But what is it called when you just ignore literally everything and declare victory? A bush? A bushman argument maybe?
So…
You admit you were wrong?
Glad to hear!
You don’t think about 47% to 64% of the population holding a position counts as widespread? Then I guess your 69% favoring getting hostages back over continuing the in the here and now aren’t widespread either.
It’s always strange how like a day after I block someone…
I get replies from accounts who haven’t been active in months, suddenly jump in and want to continue an argument for the account I stopped replying to.
Benefit of the doubt, why would you think I wanted to continue this after I stopped replying to people?
My last post was yesterday so I don’t know what you are talking about inactivity. It may be that you don’t see them due to language filters I guess.
I came across your comment which seemed to display either a severe misunderstanding or egregious bad faith. I wanted to call it out while making it clear why your comment was so wrong. Whether you want to continue the conversation is up to you. If you do, that’s great, if you don’t then my comment is there for others stumbling across it like I did.
I gave you the benefit of the doubt with your last trolly comment because we’ve had good exchanges in the past but i’ll bow out of this conversation now.
Is there a word for this? It’s not exactly a strawman cause that would involve creating a separate argument to win. But what is it called when you just ignore literally everything and declare victory? A bush? A bushman argument maybe?
It’s called being a fascist.
Sure matches their M.O., just look at Trump.