Google sent out a notification that it will automatically opt you into using content from your email campaigns to help Google know what to show in Google Search, Shopping, and Maps. It will look for content around “new arrivals, sales or ongoing promotions, social media profiles, and others,” Google said.

  • Acamon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Anyone got a any opinions (or a link to a review) of the different options? Proton and tuta come up, are there others worth considering?

    I understand that I’ll probably need to pay (otherwise I’m the product) and encryption / security is good, but the thing that keeps with Gmail (apart from inertia) is that it feels quick and easy to use. My only real experience of non Gmail sites over the last two decades have been terrible but mandatory work webmail systems that are slow, clunky and look a decade out of date. Or Hotmail, which sucks for a variety of reasons.

    • GekkeGeer@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      In general, encryption causes slow search which makes everything feel clunky. For this reason, I opted for a non-encrypted provider.

      I now personally use Posteo since they have a strong privacy policy, but a more complete and user-friendly option might be Infomaniak. They offer free email, or a suite including 1TB cloud storage for €20 per year. They’re hosting in Switzerland.

  • golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I finally just blew up my gmail the other week and not a moment to soon as it seems. Much happier with my new swiss provider.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Me, in 2005: Why would anyone use a service that scans your personal email for things to sell you?

    Me 20 years later: . . so. . . tired

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Most of us were fucking shitty teenagers when this shit was going down… I literally had nothing to hide haha

      Then Google photos uploaded all my pictures into the cloud around 2015… It finally hit me the we are dealing with rapist culture in the tech companies

      Deny the parasite profit and engagement

      These people are your enemies, never forget

  • jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Just to clarify, “you” in this case refers to companies and marketers, not consumers. Looks like this news website is for marketers/SEO industry people.

    • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      19 hours ago

      So this is another headline designed to get a kneejerk reaction outta people.

      Basically if I’m a store that sends out a weekly email to subscribers, Google will “read” that email for SEO purposes.

      • Pandemanium@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        But how do they know which email that might be? Do they even know which of my accounts are for business or personal use? If I send an email from my business email to a bunch of friends and relatives to plan a party, will Google assume those are subscribers and pull my party-planning content from my email and put that info… somewhere… on my business page? I don’t want them reading any of my emails, ever.

        The email from Google was laughable in that it contained almost no info on how this process is supposed to work. All it means to me is that I don’t have control over my own content. This should have been opt-in instead of opt-out.

        • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I assume its more of it subscribes to your newsletter same as a user would, so when you send out the newsletter to “group 1”, the google thing is also on that mailing list.

          And yes, should absolutely be opt-in, per mailing list, per email.

    • drspod@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yeah, because they’ve been doing this to us plebs for years now.

  • bent@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I’m so glad I made the choice to move away from Gmail and Google search a few years ago.

    • Nima@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      i want to get away from gmail but I can’t find a replacement that doesn’t cost a service fee to be reliable.

        • Nima@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          ahhh. so I guess I just can’t use email anymore. got it!

          edit: /s in case it was not obvious.

          • SaltSong@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            In general, no, you will not be provided services at no cost. If you want to go back to the post office, they will require you to buy stamps.

      • bent@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        That’s how the world works unfortunately, someone has to pay for it

      • Pirata@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Look into infomaniak (yes, I know, silly name), but its a serious service and very up to par with Google Suite.

        • Nima@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          thank you. i feel like i’ve seen their name around but I wasn’t quite sure what they were about.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I would ask "was it this? https://beehaw.org/comment/4363681 "

            because I found it in my notes by its website preview from when I saved it, but it seems someone deleted something and lemmy shit the bed again, and you dont have have a normal descriptive link like reddit does but only an internal database ID that does not refer to anything anymore…

            the post title was “is this normal for domain name registrars to do.”, and something that infomaniak did