It has been 15 days since the post about future of politics in this community was made, and results are somewhat clear - 35 (39 - 4) in favor of no poltics vs 4 (7 - 3) in favor of poltical natured posts.

If I use politcal lingo, this would be a landslide victory of no politics faction.

What does this mean”?

Who is “We”?

I am speakinng currently for collective group of moderators, and also the community itself (as in, we do not do that here).

We are banning schadenfreude - which roughly translates to feeling joy at someone else’s misfortune. What that means is, if there is someone who you (or a lot of people) do not like gets some disease which they could not have planned for (for example cancer), then this is not a uplifting news. If they are making losses, that is not uplifting. If they are depressed, that is not uplifting. We will not be retroactively actively removing posts, but future posts of this nature will be deleted as per understanding of moderators or community (by means of votes or reports).

We are also banning politics. That by itself is a statement political in nature. Everything is political but what we are banning is the more clearer mainstream politics. We do not really want to know if this group we do not like lost/won somewhere. But what is acceptable is, for example, some good person (good because other things they have done in life) is awarded something. This can be political in nature (example, a nobel prize), and there is no clear way to put in words what is and is not allowed. If yoou have a better method to express this, then please add in comments.

More clarification - we are not banning news which maybe political in nature, but which is toxic politics. if there is a news which is political, lets say some marginalised group got better rights, that is allowed, or even welcomed. Think simple - if you can tell some small kid the news, and they feel good, then it is uplifting. It should not require you to know what the person has done in past. If something bad happens to a bad person, then that is still bad, it does not become uplifting for a kid. this example by itself also has flaws, and I am still unable to word it well. But I hope the spirit of rule is clearer. no toxicity.

We are also banning low effort news or fake news. This could be news which is not adding anything new at all or is a copy of a copy of a copy (and bad one). Please try to fetch original sources. This is just to maintain a standard. This does not restrict you from posting a news which is targeted at a small group, or is published by a small group which may not be publishing a very fancy, furnished looking posts. Essentially - a no fluff rule.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 minutes ago

    People do have a habit of redefining “uplifting” in their own terms, such as how uplifting it is when a public figure they hate suffers.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I agree with banning misinformation and low effort.

    But you can’t ban politics. Everything is politics

    • MBM@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Everything is political but what we are banning is the more clearer mainstream politics. We do not really want to know if this group we do not like lost/won somewhere.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    couldn’t this post be considered schadenfreude for the users who didn’t enjoy the schadenfreude posts?

  • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Glad to see some great improvements. I always felt weird whenever schadenfreude posts were posted in this community and banning political posts are just the cream on top. Keep on going!

    • misterdoctor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Totally agree. Seeing someone diagnosed with cancer shared as uplifting news just felt off and not in the spirit of what this community should be about.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Agree with everything but “banning politics” - so some new green policy cannot be posted here? Those are the best uplifting news!

    • sga013@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      they can be posted. as i said - everything is politics, and we can not ban politics. for more details (there were similar queries before) please read other comments. (or just search politics)

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      I also missed it. Which is disappointing because I had brought up this subject a few times and at least wanted to take part in the discussions (luckily it went as I had hoped it would). Unfortunately, keeping a post on a Lemmy feed visible long enough for everybody to see it is kinda hard to do right now. Especially for those of us who primarily browse from our main feed pages, and not directly on the community where stickied threads can be seen.

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s hard to believe people find schandenfraude to be uplifting.

    I don’t often agree with mods banning shit. But this I can get by.

    • tko@tkohhh.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s 100% about being on topic. It’s especially important when most people see the content in the context of a mixed feed where they might upvote a news story that they like without noticing which community it was posted in.

      • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sadly yes. It is about maintaining the community standard this way. When I think of uplifting news, I’m thinking more on something like the progress in science than the Republicans getting what they finally deserve.

    • sga013@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      thank you. If you check in past (maybe go 2 weeks or more back) you will see what regular hunk was posted

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      hard to believe people find schandenfraude to be uplifting

      I watch YouTube for the endless stream of accidental amateur slapstick; you’d call it dashcam or parkour.

      This is, I think, schadenfreude. And I find people ignoring safety signs and common sense swiftly awarded with a teachable moment to be spit-takingly funny at times.

      I’m sorry. But this rule applies to me and I own that fault, and it’s sensible to exclude that here since it’s so well-covered elsewhere in a sub where I can be with my own cruel kind.

      schandenfraude

      Your phone and browser and app and ; well, everything, really, should help with this.

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I wouldn’t call slapstick schadenfreude. Schadenfreude specifically applies to people you hate getting hurt. I’m sure you don’t hate the random people operating the GoPros.

  • khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Delighted to hear this. I subbed for actually uplifting news and the schadenfreude political posts were becoming tiresome.

  • Froggie 🐸@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Question about this decision, would for example a news article about a commonly marginalised group getting rights considered political?

    An example would be for example last year’s news about Thailand becoming the first southeast Asian country to legalise gay marriage. Or the news from 2023 about how transgender people in the US were since then allowed at that time to select a non-binary mark on their passports.

    Some people could consider those political posts to not be included under the new rules, but they are very much good news and I would like to know.

    • sga013@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      they are accepted. as i said, everything is political, and we can not ban everything. if a marginalised group gets better rights, that is absolutely a uplifting news. we want to ban stupid news, like so and so leader lost/imposed so anad so orders.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Thank you. Communities like this are one of the few places left where I can just read something that makes me feel good without it coming at the expense of someone else’s misfortune (even IF they’re shitty people). Sometimes I need that little bit of escape during my day; more and more often lately, in fact. So I’m glad to see this enforced.

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    A good community is a well-moderated community.

    “Close enough” posts have killed countless subreddits. Glad to see the mods here have their shit together!

  • BigFig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Isn’t this TECHNICALLY a schadenfreude post? If you were on the side of not having such posts you’d be reading this with a sense of schadenfreude towards those who DID want the posts.

    • sga013@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      rule was enacted after this was published and i said i am not going to enact retroactively. i am from the side not wanting these posts, but maybe not as strongly worded

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      careful, you sound like you’re enjoying this a bit too much and that could be considered schadenfreude…

  • Owl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    but i love Schadenfreude. its one of the few joys left in this world