TLDR: Drug dealers in Catalonia have started to adopt GrapheneOS en masse leading to Catalan police suspecting anyone with a Google Pixel is a drug dealer

  • Flockwit@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Reminds me of when the US tried to fight “terror” by kidnapping people and shoving them in Gitmo because they were wearing Casio watches, which is apparently a brand favoured by terrorists.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Well I do use a Pixel (for lineage OS) and I do make my living selling drugs… wait wait this is a bad example.

  • nroth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Hey, the security is nice, but I really like the detailed control over notifications, GMS prompts, and network access. When I used PixelOS, my phone did things I didn’t want it to, and it was hard or impossible to make it stop. On GrapheneOS, the defaults are a pretty good experience. I even recommend it to non-techies since they can use it with the Google apps and its still a more respectful experience, even if they don’t need or want the level of control that I like.

    • nroth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      TL; DR-- There are many good reasons for regular people to prefer GrapheneOS

  • Part4@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Police are not the brightest in any society.

    So I guess somebody needs to tell them that they need to focus their efforts a little better if their current plan is ‘anyone with a Google Pixel is a drug dealer’.

    Can I suggest they start with the people with drugs, rather than the people with the – not uncommon - google phones in their search for drug dealers?

    • kadu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Police are not the brightest in any society.

      It’s a literal job requirement. If you’re smart, you’re not going to blindly follow orders. Police cognitive testing literally discards candidates that perform well in intellectual tasks. This is not a conspiracy or a joke, it’s how police works.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Reminds me of getting a notice in Middle School, decades ago, about how a pager was considered “drug paraphernalia”

    There was also a big Bloomberg-Era push by the NYPD to arrest any woman carrying condoms on her person, on the grounds that a woman carrying a condom must be a sex worker.

    • icegladiator@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Everything I hear about Bloomberg make me question how he ran as a democrat, and then I remember he fits the democratic party better than anyone else…

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        NYC’s greatest act was tricking everyone into thinking it’s a progressive city. I am interested in Mamdani at least.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Been on it for ~2 years and never going back, fuck Google, fuck the government.

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’ve also been using it for like 2 years but I really want the hardware of something like the Fairphone. A fairphone or something similar with Graphene would be amazing

        • Zetta@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The Graphene OS people have always been talking about how they eventually intend to develop their own hardware. So, possibly they will make something good eventually.

        • Zetta@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          13 hours ago

          True, with the intention of installing Graphene OS on it. No other options.

          • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Strange that google is the only option for the only “secure” operating system.
            Hey, do you know what is Ring Level minus One ?

            • Mike@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Strange that google is the only option for the only “secure” operating system.

              The have their reasons: https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

              Hey, do you know what is Ring Level minus One ?

              I know you’re only trolling here and I’m feeding into it, but you nerd sniped me just right to explain why your question is stupid on multiple fronts.

              First of all, “Ring -1” is the hypervisor, at least on virtualization-capable devices (which modern Pixels are), and the hypervisor will be Linux’s KVM in this case, which is open source and compiled by the Graphene team as part of the kernel from source.

              Secondly, Arm (which is the architecture basically all phone chips use, including Pixels) has a slightly different model of security, where apps are Exception Level 0, the OS is EL1, the hypervisor is EL2, and the “secure monitor” (or management firmware) is EL3 (and is probably what you were trying to refer to).

              So yeah, I don’t think you know what “Ring -1” is. At least not enough to warrant a snarky comment.

              • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                “-1” is not just hypervisors, things like Intel Management and AMD Platform Security Processor can peer into system memory. I have no doubt similar system exist on ARM, I suspect the radio transceiver can also read system memory and read secrets out of the security devices.

                I don’t think modern phones are trustable devices. They are opaque blackboxes, pretending to have high security but this security only really protects the spyware operators from being notices.

                I don’t think it’s coincidence that the most “secure” and “private” operating system only operates on a very narrow model selection of phones from just one manufacturer. Probably because they have the best technology to keep the inherent backdoor invisible and implausible. A backdoor to a system nobody trusts wouldn’t be very useful.

                • Zetta@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  The original post is about how it’s so secure the piggies can’t get in. Unless the super secret backdoor is only for the shadow government to disappear dissidents with no trace, thus keeping their super secret backdoor secret.

  • NoodlePoint@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    How it used to be old GSM phones like those from Nokia that were then the thing for the underworld.

  • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    The police: ‘We’ve encountered a difficulty with our paid spying software. Welp it must be just the criminals.’

    Edit: Missed the R and hit the T on our.

  • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    “Feds”

    checks Wikipedia page for Spain

    Government: “Unitary parliamentary constitutional monarchy”

    🧐

    (Sorry for nitpicking lol 😅)


    But serious tho:

    I kinda hate these weird associations. Its like arresting people who wear glasses because intellectual rebels wear glasses? (Pol Pot?)

    Like can’t someone just use a phone in peace? Most Pixel users don’t even use Graphene OS.

    Hey you know what, drug dealers drink water. Lets arrest people who drink water!

    • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s supposed to be kind of sort of federal(ish) (federalish enough, in theory, to keep Catalonia and Euskadi happy enough that we won’t want to leave). “States” are called autonomías (autonomies) and have their own government, laws, and institutions, though they still have to obey the Spanish government and most of its laws. It isn’t really working.

      The article is still wrong when it uses “feds”, though, because the cops doing this are the mossos d’esquadra, the Catalan autonomic police, not the “federal(ish)” policía nacional (the Spanish police proper) or guardia civil (despite the name, the military Spanish police, a relic from Franco’s dictatorship, like most of the country and its institutions).

  • Bluewing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Glances at my new Pixel, Welp, I guess I ain’t ever goin’ to Catalonia. Not that I was planning to go there anyway.

    ***Tinfoil conspiracy: Maybe this a scare tactic to keep the British out of Spain.

  • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    295
    ·
    1 day ago

    Basically, if you don’t have a phone the cops can easily backdoor, you must be a criminal.

    “What do you have to hide?” taken to it’s logical conclusion.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Humans are apes desiring power, there’s no excuse under which you can give it to them. They’ll invent authority giving them right to judge you and think they are in the right.

      Also why I absolutely despise the Silicon Valley - it’s many such people who think they are the elite now. I want that place detroited as soon as possible. Zuckerberg prosecuted for all the murders he’s committed (I’m certain there are plenty, a person with ASPD with such power just can’t be anything else) which are now unknown, Brin and other jerks playing “cooperating with legal elected authorities” while giving them something with no mandate whatsoever feeling themselves powerful - prosecuted for high treason, all these playing censorship and recommendation - prosecuted for scams on the scale of billions, yadda-yadda.

      Cops saying this should be immediately sued for inciting hate or defamation or whatever against people who don’t want to be backdoored.

      I have a right to not be surveilled, they don’t have a right to surveil me.

      Anyway, I might all the time fly a weird trajectory between various ideologies, but they are all anarchist and Silicon Valley bosses are all thieves.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 hours ago

        they are all anarchist and Silicon Valley bosses are all thieves.

        Nothing is ever absolute, but Silicon Valley has been going in a consistently bad direction for 20+ years now.

    • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      112
      ·
      1 day ago

      Basically, if you don’t have a phone the cops can easily backdoor, you must be a criminal.

      … and if it’s an obscenely expensive one.

      Normal people either can’t afford these devices or don’t have time for all the hassle of installing and using a rare operating system on a phone.

      • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        102
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Pixels are mid range if you buy a generation back. I have 6a and paid $250 two years ago.

        No one forces you to root your Pixel, you are allowed to use it with stock android.

      • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can install Graphene from the browser, it’s really not a huge hassle to install especially if you do it right when you get the phone.

      • IllNess@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Minimum wage in Spain is €1,300 per month. A Pixel 9a is under $500 and under €550 and currently on sale for $449 and €500. A couple of hundred can get you a Pixel 9. What exactly is a not obscenely price for a flagship phone to you?

        And I don’t even understand your second comment. People spend over an hour a day on social media alone.

        So the normal person in Spain could buy this phone and the normal person in Spain does have the time to figure out how to install a “rare” operating system. A “rare” operating system that’s free and easily copied.

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Rare is a matter of popular practice, not difficulty.

          It’s rare to walk around with an actual tinfoil hat, but not difficult or expensive to do.

          • IllNess@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            When someone says “rare operating system”, the word “rare” describes “operating system”.

            Here is the statement again:

            Normal people either can’t afford these devices or don’t have time for all the hassle of installing and using a rare operating system on a phone.

            In your sentence, “rare” is used to describe “it”, a pronoun, which refers to the action “to walk around with an actual tinfoil hat”.

              • IllNess@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                I commented a user’s use of “rare”. Then you did the same to my comment.

                I didn’t think how the initial poster use of the word “rare” meant to describe “a matter of popular practice, not difficulty.” So I replied back to you.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Normal people either can’t afford these devices or don’t have time for all the hassle

        Had a friend who was getting by on $2k/mo and got herself a $1400 top of the line iPhone, because her carrier gave her a reduction in her monthly payment plan (for an obscene amount of debt and locked-in service on the back end). Her brother jail-broke it for her and did the normal “cleaning off all the bloatware” due-diligence.

        This is just something we all put up with in the modern day. “Normal people” have a harder time navigating the bullshit, but its a lake we all have to paddle through.

        • sip@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          maybe they dumbed down “a custom ROM” or just didn’t want to name GrapheneOS

      • icegladiator@lemy.lolOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        GrapheneOS is most used on old Google Pixels which are anything but “obscenely expensive”

      • Benaaasaaas@group.lt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 day ago

        Pixel 9 pro with 512Gb is obscenely expensive. Pixel 8a, with minimal storage is pretty affordable. 7a dare I say cheap.

      • spamspeicher@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Interesting, at least four people in my closer circle aren’t normal people. Including myself.

      • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        The refurbished pixel 8 I bought cost a fraction of what I’d have paid for a new phone and the installation took 5 minutes.

      • Elextra@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        The A series lines have been the best value smartphones generation after generation. I would not say theyre expensive. I have bought each current gen for about $350 or less (excluding tax), no trade in.

  • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    180
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is the best recommendation for a phone I’ve seen yet.

    Thanks catalonian police