Transcript
False meme image that says “bad news ipv4 fans. linus torvalds has announced removing ipv4 support from the linux kernel after the maintainers of the network stack got into a fight over WHAT KIND OF HRT gives the best results. this incident will impact 5 billion people and will make 95% of all network equipment on Earth binnable.” with fake screenshots of the linux kernel mailing list a girl calling another one a slur from 4chan over HRT choices and Linus Torvalds saying he will drop IPv4 support and asking the maintainers to learn to shut the fuck up.
A major ISP in the UK still doesn’t have any IPv6 support :( https://www.havevirginmediaenabledipv6yet.co.uk/
I believed it for a moment
You got me in the first half 😁
Ipv4 is simpler and therefore easier for my brain to comprehend.
I deliberately disable IPv6 on all the devices on my home network because it’s really f**n annoying when some service tries to bind to localhost but picks up the IPv6 localhost instead of the IPv4 one
I’ve encountered way too many administrators and network admins who swear that “IPv6 does nothing but cause trouble” but the truth is, the trouble it’s causing is because you can’t half-implement IPv6. You either roll it out to the whole network or you don’t, and the longer you kick that can down the road the harder it’s going to be.
Basically too many professionals who haven’t learned a new technology since 2005 and refuse to try new things keep holding the world back
I don’t even have an ipv6 address, my ISP doesn’t provide them yet. Not much to do about it then lol.
You can maybe change ISP
I think what those admins really mean to say is “We don’t need any of the benefits of IPv6, so IPv4 works just fine and making the large scale change is trouble.”, when you already got your DHCP, NAT, Firewall and stuff up and things do work as expected then you don’t really need NDP or SLAAC.
I will happily enable and use it once doing so doesn’t break any of my connectivity.
I’m not managing an enterprise network, it’s just my home, but my ISP doesn’t support IPv6 so that’s one extra layer of complexity right off the hop. On top of that internal services switch which previously required no manual configuration just seem to randomly not work.
IPv6 is not going to see widespread adoption unless it can be implemented completely transparently for the end user, full stop.
The issue for me is when I have it enabled and try to connect to a site that doesn’t support it fully (same thing / half assed) and the site doesn’t work properly. For home its my wife and kids that complain, when its the office then everyone complains. I get the blame for failed connections or things not working right when a fully compliant IPv6 site works just fine.
Now I am not perfect so It could be me but I have read up and learned as much as possible. No expert but I did deploy DHCPv6 in a test environment. However there is no reason as of yet to deploy DHCPv6 locally since the address space is so wide. Just saying Its possible that the issue is me but from my understanding its like the U.S.A. switching to metric. Parts of us tried it but others didn’t and thus we failed as a giant group.
I think there needs to be a big ass push and force everyone to switch as the same time. I know some of the old devices may not work however those devices have to be 20+ years by now.
Basically too many professionals who haven’t learned a new technology since 2005 and refuse to try new things keep holding the world back
If it ain’t broke…
I always bring it up when the network is experiencing problems that they wouldn’t have with IPv6. Running out of IPs in a given scope, increasing costs of public IPs, etc.
“IPv4 is running out of IP addresses so therefore every local network needs to move to IPv6” is a full clown move.
First of all, enterprises usually have at least one public IP (the one I work at right now has more public IPs than they have server VMs)
Secondly enterprises have big enough and complex enough networks to see other benefits of IPv6. For example IPv4 has some problems when broadcast domains are too large, so your internal network sizes are artificially limited when following best practices. Without private networks you don’t have to worry about IP collisions between different private networks that you have to route between (comes up more than you’d think!) etc etc.
In a local network there is no point in using ipv6.
It is interesting when you run out of ip addresses for the amount of devices you have.
So in the open Internet.
Unless I am missing something.
Why not? It’s as easy as ipv4
A couple of things that IPv6 does better for local networks is link local addressing (fe80::). and multicasting.
In IPv4, they kind of hacked something out of 169.254, but if you have more than one NIC, it pretty much becomes useless.
If you have a service designed explicitly never to be accessed over a router, then you can live in fe80:: a lot more easily than trying to do the same thing with 169.254.
Maybe this will move my ISP to provide IPv6.
IPv4 killed my parents.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Take your pills, Alice.
Please, at least 85% of that network equipment hasn’t been updated in 30 years and they’re not about to start now.
Do you want to play a game?
What’s a Gigahon?
transphobic slur used on 4chan to refer to trans women who do not pass as cis women
also, injections are the best route of administration for estrogen
also, injections are the best route of administration for estrogen
people like you are the reason we’re losing IPv4 support on linux! (/s of course)
at least I’m right 😝
also you’re welcome for ushering in a new era of progress
Oof that’s way worse than I thought
here’s the rabbit hole if you’d like to learn more: https://www.brainworms.lgbt/
Just remember, a lot of trans people have internalized transphobia - that doesn’t excuse it, but it’s important context that a lot of this is self loathing.
I actually just thought it was calling someone extra naive. Like when someone says something naive, and you go “Oh hon…” Or “Oh my sweet summer child…”
Ironically, that’s kind of where I find myself now.
oh honey, my sweet summer child 😄
Linus did a follow-up: https://⚧.fm/notes/abh00crrs1gcja8q
This is the first time I’ve seen a punycode domain name in the wild.
I’ve seen https://マリウス.com/ before
It’s disappointing in my browser
Basically told them to shove it up their colon
Followup:
THE TOASTER WILL BE REPLACED.
Fucking legendary quote from Linus.
It’s a shame it’s fake.
do you have proof that it’s fake though
There is the rule number one of the linux kernel: “We don’t break userspace.” Linux has refused fixes for buggy behavior in the past because of this rule. This would most certainly break userspace.
Also the alt text of the original image states this is fake.
I’m glad that Linus clarified that it was High Resolution Timers. I was honestly thinking they were arguing about Hormone Replacement Therapy.
Given the demographics of Linux devs, it probably would be the latter.
I know! It seemed totally plausible! There is a very odd discrepancy between that and the general population.
Trans people are either writing kernel code or playing hearts of iron 4. Nothing else is allowed.
It ended up that way though
Chat, is this real?
Check the alt text.
Aw, dang it. I don’t know shit about IPv6 vs IPv4 other than how it be written, but I wanted some chaos
I’m sure he emails the kernel he works on regularly
Is the raccoon gif real?
none of this is.
Thanks for the alt text & transcript in OP. It’s missing here, though.
Transcript
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] Remove IPv4 support from kernel, effective next merge window
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2025 10:42:00 -0700
Message-ID: <20250815-drop-ipv4@linux-foundation.org>Hey folks,
After yet another deeply technical and entirely calm discussion about HRT (High-Resolution Timers) that somehow devolved into 200+ replies, personal insults, and at least one GIF of a raccoon, I have decided it’s time to take drastic measures.
Effective next merge window, we will be removing IPv4 support from the kernel. This will both (a) resolve the maintainers’ scheduling disputes, and (b) force the world into the IPV6 utopia we were promised back in 1998.
If you need IPv4 after this point, you can either:
- run an ancient kernel from before the change (good luck with the bugs), or
- rewrite your applications to use IPv6 and learn to love colons in your addresses.
Yes, I realize this will break roughly *everything *.
No, I don’t care. I have already switched all my machines to IPv6-only, except for the toaster, which unfortunately still insists on using a 192. 168. x. x address. The toaster will be replaced.If you disagree with this decision, I suggest you take it up with the HRT maintainers. But please keep it civil this time. (Or at least keep the raccoon GIFs under 1MB.)
- Linus
What a bunch of babies. They can’t work together so they make the world suffer.
Got it
Edit. I looked. It’s a joke. They got me. I’m leaving this to show my shame
Truly a Solomonic decision.
A highly nuclear option. I hope that those developers get their act together in time.
this is a joke btw.
I noticed. But sometimes, LT can be a bit explosive, and we all know that devs can be bitches about their code. I would not put it past Linus that he actally threatens some fully nuclear option to bring some boneheads to reason.
Well I’m not going to switch away my perfectly functional mesh routers that uses IPv4 as using IPv6 on a local net that I may sometimes need to type in manually is rather stupid. And that would also bin my routers, so I’m not doing that either.
Oh well, I guess it’s been fun guys, no more Linux for me due to potential future security issues.
Do you even DNS?
No. But if this is true (which I do doubt completely, Linus can’t be this dumb to singlehandedly cripple his OS), this should also affect every intranet address.
The current description of IPv6 intranet is just ridiculously dumb anyway. Should I want to ssh into a local device, I’ll have to type in for example
fd9e:9aa0:c00f:1::a, with only thefdpart being the same for all intranets rather than192.168.1.10with192.168generally always being the same.Edit: wait… Are you telling me to set DNS redirects on all my local devices? Yeah, that’ll work, but why the even…
I don’t think I’ve entered an IP address for a local device in years. Everything is accessible using
<hostname>.localthanks to mDNS. Avahi has been doing this for… 20 years I think?Cool. My mesh doesn’t have that though (I think?). But admittedly that’s a tangent. If IPv4 ever depreciates, I’ll have to toss my mesh anyway.
Pihole automatically adds clients that get an IP from its DHCP component. All my clients are server.local, client1.local, tv1.local, etc. So I can use their DNS name everywhere.
Even if it don’t want to use pihole(why?), you can edit the SSH config and add addresses for each host so you can just type
ssh serverwait… Are you telling me to set DNS redirects on all my local devices? Yeah, that’ll work, but why the even…
What do you mean by that? I’m pretty sure people are telling you to run a DNS server and set up entries for any clients you want to regularly connect to.
with only the fd part being the same for all intranets
Why?
I think ipv4 for internal networks is fine.
if this is true (which I do doubt completely
I really want to believe that you doubt it completely.
Yeah, I really have put too much time into replying to all these based solely on a hypothetical. But I did learn something from all these comments (technical something, not me being an idiot), so it’s all good.
You will do as you’re told!
Yes daddy!
I think it is more likely that 95% of network equipment supports IPv6
Except whatever brings internet to my apartment apparently
Your ISP needs to setup IPv6 which isn’t trivial to do from scratch.
What provider is it?
Mine is Quantum Fiber, a sister of CenturyLink. CL has it, apparently QF doesn’t. Or at least not natively, rather 6rd. And then possibly not on the modem they installed? At any rate, I haven’t been able to find anything online.
I’m on one of the regions of fiber that CenturyLink spun off to a private equity firm a few years ago. Zero IPv6 support here
My dream. IPv6 adoption would skyrocket to a degree unimaginable and those who don’t want to, will fall behind unless they move their asses and learn.
As long as IPv2 support remains intact, I’m good.
/s
